this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Technology

63186 readers
3465 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Glass0448@lemmy.today 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

OMG. Every other post is saying their disgusted about the images part but it's a grey area, but he's definitely in trouble for contacting a minor.

Cartoon CSAM is illegal in the United States. AI images of CSAM fall into that category. It was illegal for him to make the images in the first place BEFORE he started sending them to a minor.

https://www.thefederalcriminalattorneys.com/possession-of-lolicon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PROTECT_Act_of_2003

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Would Lisa Simpson be 8 years old, or 43 because the Simpsons started in 1989?

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Big brain PDF tells the judge it is okay because the person in the picture is now an adult.

[–] arefx@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You can say pedophile.... that "pdf file" stuff is so corny and childish. Hey guys lets talk about a serious topic by calling it things like "pdf files" and "Graping". Jfc

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Yeah that's toothless. They decided there is no particular way to age a cartoon, they could be from another planet that simply seem younger but are in actuality older.

It's bunk, let them draw or generate whatever they want, totally fictional events and people are fair game and quite honestly I'd Rather they stay active doing that then get active actually abusing children.

Outlaw shibari and I guarantee you'd have multiple serial killers btk-ing some unlucky souls.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

My main issue with generation is the ability of making it close enough to reality. Even with the more realistic art stuff, some outright referenced or even traced CSAM. The other issue is the lack of easy differentiation between reality and fiction, and it muddies the water. "I swear officer, I thought it was AI" would become the new "I swear officer, she said she was 18".

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

That is not an end user issue, that's a dev issue. Can't train on scam if it isn't available and as such is tacit admission of actual possession.

[–] MDKAOD@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think the challenge with Generative AI CSAM is the question of where did training data originate? There has to be some questionable data there.

[–] erwan@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

There is also the issue of determining if a given image is real or AI. If AI were legal, that means prosecution would need to prove images are real and not AI with the risk of letting go real offenders.

The need to ban AI CSAM is even clearer than cartoon CSAM.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

And in the process force non abusers to seek their thrill with actual abuse, good job I'm sure the next generation of children will appreciate your prudish factually inept effort. We've tried this with so much shit, prohibition doesn't stop anything or just creates a black market and a abusive power system to go with it.