Linux

48329 readers

639 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

224

Systemd Looks to Replace sudo with run0 (news.itsfoss.com)

submitted 6 months ago by petsoi@discuss.tchncs.de to c/linux@lemmy.ml

141 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Adanisi@lemmy.zip -3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Fuck off Poettering. Stop trying to absorb the whole system.

EDIT: apparently systemd absorbing the whole system with it's nonstandard, monolithic nightmare is a good thing, judging from downvotes. Carry on.

[–] drwho@beehaw.org 5 points 6 months ago

He's trying to turn Linux into Windows NT. And Microsoft hired him as a reward for doing so.

[–] technom@programming.dev 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The vast majority of Linux users consider systemd as a good thing because it apparently makes system administration easier. They also don't agree that systemd is monolithic, because it's actually designed modular.

But of course there are detractors. The only thing I like about systemd is its declarative service definition and parallel service startup. But if I wanted to run an OS with bloated and inscrutable software (even with the source code), my choice wouldn't be Linux or Systemd.

I also routinely switch parts of my OS. This is harder with systemd. Although it is modular, the modules are so tightly coupled that it will prevent the replacement of modular components with alternatives. Frankly, I think systemd is killing the innovation in system component development.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 months ago

Yeah... Not sure how everyone lets them get away with calling it "modular" when it's next to impossible to swap out the modules