this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
424 points (92.4% liked)

Asklemmy

43970 readers
757 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I swear, ~~every time~~ most of the time I see someone being particularly rude, ignorant, and inappropriate on a post (usually political in origin, or they swing it to being political) I click on their profile and see it has been created that same day.

They are only there to sow discord. Only to piss people off. Idk if we can just report them (for what?) but I'd like to try exposing them before responding and interacting..

I am guilty of gobbling up the bait. I've started looking at profiles of people that piss me off exceptionally and noticed they're burner bot loser accounts.

I guess i just want to say I've noticed it!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] socsa@lemmy.ml -4 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I don’t see it as left punching as much as calling out campists and .ml mods. I see it as holding up actual leftist values rather than forming a political philosophy around relitigating the cold war. I have never defended Israel, I have called out the issue with religious fundamentalism in this conflict. I have and will continue to call Israel an apartheid state.

Like I said, MLs literally cannot imagine the existence of political theory after 1924.

Also, my account is at least 5% femboy worship. At least do your homework.

[–] RoseTintedGlasses@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

my account is at least 5% femboy worship

Average chaser lol. People will unironically just declare "hey, I have a fetish for objectifying crossdressing twinks!" and then act like it's a completely normal, not creepy thing to say out of nowhere because it's funny when it's queer people being randomly fetishized

[–] socsa@lemmy.ml -4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I'll let my partner know that you think they are a fetish. They'll get a kick out of it. If I was you I'd probably find your comment offensive.

you a PDA type? Damn, that's unfortunate.

[–] frauddogg@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

my partner

🧢🧢🧢🧢🧢🧢🧢🧢🧢

if a chaser managed to pull the object of their fetishization that's really just torturing the poor victim; and I refuse to believe someone could be so self-hating as to dabble with such a prime example of an intellectual, ethical, and philosophical equivalent of a black hole like you. That's a level of self-hatred that shouldn't be possible without burning out its holder.

[–] brain_in_a_box@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don’t see it as left punching as much as calling out campists and .ml mods.

I don't think anyone really cares how you see it: its all just you railing at anyone to the left of Elizabeth Warren.

I see it as holding up actual leftist values

Leftist values like western chauvinism, anti-communism, pro-capitalism, and Zionism.

I have never defended Israel

Lol, sure thing.

[–] socsa@lemmy.ml -3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yes, Marx definitely wrote a lot about "western chauvinism." Perhaps you mean "social chauvinism?" Because it's definitely very confusing language for the under studied. Perhaps you should pick up some German language.

Again, I just can't help but be struck by the stark chasm between this liturgical internet "leftism," which seems confused between the principals of pragmatic worker liberation, versus the fantasy that Lenin's autocracy ever achieved anything noteworthy. But I guess populist fan service gets engagement, so who cares about results, right?

[–] brain_in_a_box@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yes, Marx definitely wrote a lot about “western chauvinism.” Perhaps you mean “social chauvinism?”

"MLs cannot imagine political theory after 1924! But also, unless Karl Marx himself explicitly said it, it isn't real!'

Because it’s definitely very confusing language for the under studied. Perhaps you should pick up some German language.

Lol, perfect. I can tell you watch Oppenheimer recently...

Again, I just can’t help but be struck by the stark chasm between this liturgical internet “leftism,” which seems confused between the principals of pragmatic worker liberation, versus the fantasy that Lenin’s autocracy ever achieved anything noteworthy.

You think the USSR wasn't a noteworthy improvement on imperial Russia? And your calling other people 'under-studied'? Good lord, liberals really are proudly ignorant.

so who cares about results, right?

MLs. MLs are the ones who care about results and 'practical workers liberation', rather than liberals, who simply demand instant utopia while defending capitalism.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml -2 points 7 months ago

Like I said, MLs literally cannot imagine the existence of political theory after 1924.

get a load of this gramsci-heh mao-wave josus-stalin fidel-wut che-poggers deng-smile xi sankara-salute angela