this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
21 points (92.0% liked)

Dungeons and Dragons

11056 readers
275 users here now

A community for discussion of all things Dungeons and Dragons! This is the catch all community for anything relating to Dungeons and Dragons, though we encourage you to see out our Networked Communities listed below!

/c/DnD Network Communities

Other DnD and related Communities to follow*

DnD/RPG Podcasts

*Please Follow the rules of these individual communities, not all of them are strictly DnD related, but may be of interest to DnD Fans

Rules (Subject to Change)

Format: [Source Name] Article Title

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world
owenfromcanada@lemmy.world
21
It's Homebrew Time! This time, I'll be sharing the Archer Class: A non-caster (depending on subclass) alternative to the ranger, with a bit less focus on nature (open images in new tab if too small) (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by Devil_Master@lemmy.world to c/dnd@lemmy.world
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] unmarketableplushie@pawb.social 5 points 1 year ago

Interesting concept! I can't comment too much on the balance, but I still have come criticisms.

  • Charisma doesn't make a whole lot of sense for a saving throw proficiency. I would probably replace it with Intelligence.
  • The weapon proficiencies are also a bit odd. The player starts with melee weapons, gets access to fighting styles that benefit their usage, but isn't proficient in them? They should at least get proficiency with all simple weapons maybe a list like: "simple weapons, blowgun, hand crossbow, heavy crossbow, longbow" would be good.
  • No abilities at second level? I guess that might be because that's when the ranger gets spells and you removed that. It's super disappointing to level up, especially after the first level-up of the game, and get literally no new abilities. Out of all the base classes in the game, only spellcasters get "dead levels" (levels without any features), and that's because they get access to the next spell level on those levels (exception: the warlock's level 18 is dead, but to be fair that's after they can cast 9th level spells, plus they at least get a new Invocation). Maybe give them Action Surge or something?
  • The whole class feels very loaded towards the subclasses doing things while the "chassis" of the class doesn't do a whole lot. I'm not sure if that's a bad thing or not, but that definitely stuck out to me.
  • I feel like it would make more sense for the Spellshot to be a โ…“-caster (like eldritch knight or arcane trickster instead of getting spells up to 7th level. That's how other subclass casters do it. Subclass casters also usually get their own spell lists.
  • Magic Arrows is super confusing, relies too much on randomness, and doesn't scale well.
  • I know I'm being mostly negative here, but I really love the concept behind the Jagged Arrow archer. It's a very flavourful concept and I feel like we need more subclasses like that.