this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2024
121 points (94.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43963 readers
1147 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Define "the world".

Are we talking about the actual ball of rock? The collective ecology of organisms living on it? Or specifically the human race's existence on the rock and within the ecology?

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If we narrow it down to all organic life on the planet, the answer is: humans.

[–] imnotfromkaliningrad@lemmy.ml -3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

humans are part of the organic life on this planet (and since recently even outside) and your proposal would be pretty bad for them. fuck off ecofash

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You’re right, that it would be bad for humans. I’m just looking at the big picture and what would good for it in the long run.

Humans already make similar decisions anyway. Certain part of the population will suffer so that another one can benefit. Occasionally, these sorts of decisions also lead to deaths. In an even larger scale, humans have also decided that certain animals and plants can suffer so that humans may thrive. Imagine if the ecosystem as a whole could make a decision like this about itself. Do you think the it would keep humanity, remove it entirely or maybe trim it down a bit?

But seriously though, humans are here to stay for the time being, and I prefer to keep it that way. Unlike Linkola, I’m in no hurry to see disasters wipe out a portion of humanity.

[–] imnotfromkaliningrad@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

so you realize that the problem isnt within humanity itself, but class division. those classes a social construct and can be overcome. join your local radical leftist organization, read theory and start fighting for a better world not only for humanity but for the rest of life as well.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What kind of theory do you recommend?

[–] imnotfromkaliningrad@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

as a ml its firstly gonna be the obvious ones: marx, engels and lenin. marx style can be a little hard to read sometimes, but it will make you see the world with new eyes truly. i genuinely recommend this reading list.

[–] CriticalResist@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

hey thanks it's my list πŸ˜€

[–] imnotfromkaliningrad@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

thanks comrade for your work!

[–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml -2 points 7 months ago

Pls be kind on the internet child