this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
197 points (97.6% liked)

Privacy

32159 readers
279 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is the problem with using VPN services in general, you have to have complete trust in the service provider.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

What's important here is not the source code, but whether the service collects unnecessary information.

Craigslist does a pretty good job of respecting privacy.

[–] proletar_ian@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I agree. However, I think that most people won't use Craigslist simply because it doesn't have a lot of the modern niceties, specifically modern messaging solutions. The email system they have is pretty painful to use.

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's easy enough to do messaging via text, or whatever other contact info you choose to give out. I like that I can use Craigslist without giving them much info about myself.

If you're suggesting that a messaging system built into the venue is critical for success, then I suppose all of us wanting privacy are out of luck for now... but perhaps Craigslist (or some other privacy-friendly venue) could make it happen by integrating Matrix.

[–] proletar_ian@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I agree that most messaging services are problematic, but Facebook having Messenger is part of the moat that's keeping FB users on Marketplace. I think offering any non-email messaging solution would be hugely beneficial. I like the Matrix idea quite a bit.

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 8 months ago

Europe's new Digital Markets Act might help in this department, too, through legally mandated interoperable messaging. Let's hope it works out in our favor.

[–] strawberry@kbin.run 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Craigslist also doesn't have shit on it. try and buy a car on there. if you're looking for a beater, sure. but a halfway decent sports car, fb marketplace is the only place

its still OK for other stuff, I've bought tools and whatnot off Craigslist, but for vehicles fb is unfortunately still king

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

What you're describing is the network effect in action, not a flaw in Craigslist.

(It will be the same with every alternative you find, except perhaps one that's well funded with outside money, which will be awful on the privacy front, of course.)

The way we overcome a network effect is piece by piece:

  • First we switch to the privacy-friendly service for everything we can. That immediately reduces our exposure, reduces the power of the incumbent, and makes the alternative more useful by giving more users a reason to switch.
  • Then, over time, we switch for the remaining things as we find a suitable service for each one. (This might even be the same privacy-friendly alternative we started with, after it has grown a little.)

If I felt I had to buy a sports car, and some awful invasive site like Facebook was somehow the only viable venue, I would buy just the car there. I wouldn't make them the middle man for every other transaction in my life.

[–] strawberry@kbin.run 2 points 8 months ago

well yea its not Craigslist itself that's the issue, its the fact that its a smaller platform. and yea I use eBay or Craigslist for everything but vehicles.its sad that Craigslist has been forgotten though.