Asklemmy

43963 readers

1067 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

118

What is your favorite paradox or conundrum? I am partial to can god kill god? (lemmy.world)

submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by Daft_ish@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

291 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The monotheistic all powerful one.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MxM111@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The answer is yes. He can create such rock.

[–] yolobrolofosholo@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

But then the answer to if he can do anything would be a no, since he can't pick up the rock

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The question boils down to can an omnipotent being give up his omnipotence. The answer is yes. When he gives up his omnipotence there is no paradox to him no-longer being able to pick up a rock.

[–] Bizarroland@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not even that. Omnipotence means that you can both make something impossible for yourself and still be able to do it. Paradoxes have nothing on omnipotence.

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I don't like that definition because it makes the word meaningless. Omnipotence means all powerful (with in the reference of the speaker, or whatever constraints of the word "power" the speaker is using.) If omnipotence is incomprehensible, then maybe we should invent a different word to convey that idea, perhaps "Godly". As it is, omnipotence as a word has value in the English language that is distinct from God. Same with Omniscience, or any of the other Omni's.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 0 points 8 months ago

He can pick up the rock too. The whole concept is that he's not bound by normal human logic.