this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
398 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37742 readers
515 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rho50@lemmy.nz 27 points 8 months ago (10 children)

There are some very impressive AI/ML technologies that are already in use as part of existing medical software systems (think: a model that highlights suspicious areas on an MRI, or even suggests differential diagnoses). Further, other models have been built and demonstrated to perform extremely well on sample datasets.

Funnily enough, those systems aren't using language models 🙄

(There is Google's Med-PaLM, but I suspect it wasn't very useful in practice, which is why we haven't heard anything since the original announcement.)

[–] Ludrol@szmer.info 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (9 children)

I have read some headline that said that some of these models just measure age of a patient and a quality of the machine making photos.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 18 points 8 months ago (5 children)

I have read some headline

Really.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Says all you need to know about their opinion lol

[–] Ludrol@szmer.info 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Still AI misalignment is a real issue. I just don't remember which model was studied and had been found out that it was missaligned.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That and bias, absolutely need improvements. That doesn't mean LLMs can't be extremely effective if given appropriate tasks. The problem is that the people who make decisions about where they're used aren't technical enough to understand their strengths and limitations

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I don’t think technical knowledge gives as good a sense as a lot of experience working with one.

Like saying the guys who designed a particular car would know best how it’ll perform on various racetracks. My sense is a driver would have a better sense.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 2 points 8 months ago

I guess what I meant by technical knowledge meant to be less about general tech and more about specifically LLM tech

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)