this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
139 points (68.1% liked)

Fediverse

17788 readers
4 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml
wakest@lemmy.ml
139
petition: Defederate any instances that federates with threads proactivly , add threads.net on blocklists everywhere. (lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by ModdedPhones@lemmy.ml to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
111 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I really want to nip threads in the bud. Besides blocking threads.net itself, defederate from any instances that do not. This is blatantly an EEE strategy and a united front is the only way to save what have been accomplished. Here is how Indivudals can do it on mastodont as an example to follow. https://hachyderm.io/@crowgirl/110663465238573628 Edit found this , https://fedipact.online/ please sign.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] misaloun@reddthat.com 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I hate defederation for things like this. This should be a user's choice, not imposed by the instance itself. I hate how the fediverse forces the moderation choices on you.

I dont care that instagram uses activityPub. As long as I can use activityPub myself, thats enough for me. Most people will always stick with big social media, and I would rather be able to interact with them vs. not

[–] kogasa@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nothing is forced on anyone. The user can choose a different instance that does federate with Threads, and still participate in the first instance.

[–] CheeseQueen@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What this post is asking for is exactly not that, that if you are in any instance that federates threads, then you shouldnt be able to interact with any that follows this posts petition

[–] kogasa@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, I don't agree with that. It just doesn't stop anyone from using either platform.

[–] animist@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why shouldn't the instance owner make that choice? It's their hardware, time, money, and desire that made that instance. As soon as I start one, first thing I'm doing is making sure it never gets federated with fashy instances or meta.

[–] bluejay@partizle.com 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah this is a weird spot with who really wants to control things. I would argue anyone with a strong opinion one way or the other should probably self host. Those that can't will need to find an instance where their views line up with the instance admin.

Ultimately I think you're right though, instance admin has final say since uh, they're the admin. Anyone who wants to admin a huge instance probably would leave it open for users to decide though.