Asklemmy

43945 readers

638 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Is anyone else getting tired about the UI/UX craze where everything needs to be designed like it's meant for braindead users? (yiffit.net)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Wander@yiffit.net to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I hate the damage that Apple seems to have done in this regard. I also hate it when apps hide features because "they're for power users and regular users won't understand them".

Sure, there's a difference between UX being so bad that it's frustrating to use and "we need to simplify things because we don't want to scare the users".

Lemmy UI has its problems to solve and features to add, but it's not bad, even on mobile. I've been using it extensively and it does fine all things considered.

~~Anyways, at this point I believe there's even a benefit to making a UI a bit ugly and scary, so you end up with a higher quality of users instead of quantity, as cold as it might sound.~~

Edit: I didn't mean to just talk about Lemmy. That was just an example and I understand that for a social platform numbers are important. My rant was more general in regards to the dumbing down of UI in all areas.

Edit2: I'm sorry. I didn't want to come off as elitist. I'm actually concerned about the loss of power user features more than non-tech savvy users having a bad time.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bhj@lemmy.one 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Umm... No? There is no correlation between quality of user and their willingness to trudge through a bad UX.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 2 points 1 year ago

I think there is an important difference between UX and UI here.

In terms of UI I fully agree with the poster here. Over architected and designed uis are annoying and cumbersome. I've seen too many designers over design for the sake of design.

UX however is a different matter. User eXperience should be brain dead simple. Follows the actual customer quote - "the customer is always right", meaning if the customer thinks there should be a button here that does the thing, there probably should be. Even if it breaks some design rules, obviously the experience demands it.