Maybe for genuine human rights abuses (though even then they can easily do more harm than good), but not in cases like this where bad faith claims of abuse were manufactured to justify the ban in the first place.

[+] Badeendje@lemmy.world -5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] brain_in_a_box@lemmy.ml 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Are you now referring to/citing some left wing propaganda from the depths of the internet

Nope, just facts.

renowned NGO’s

Renowned NGOs that ate inevitably based on Washington, funded by the USA government, and are just reprinting Adrian Zenz anyway.

governments with tons of pictures

By all means, let's see these "governments with tons of pictures". I'm sure you can definitely produce them, and aren't just lying through your teeth.

plenty of people who experienced the prisons

Funny how, even though the camps have supposedly been housing 7 digit numbers of people for a decades now, "plenty of people" remains a single digit number.

The fact everyone makes the same accusations

What are you talking about? It's not "everyone" making these accusations; it's literally just the same Western media sources that told us Iraq had WMDs and Hamas beheads babies. The entire non-western world, including the UN, knows these accusations are bullshit.

[–] BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Are we talking about Uyghurs? The OHCHR report was pretty damning.

[–] filoria@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Because UN institutions have been so effective in the context of Gaza.

Western institutions aren't worth the shit they're printed on.

[–] BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah shock that something that needs countries to vote on resolutions has a hard time making change.

brain_in_a_box said that the UN believed nothing happened I prooved that was incorrect.

Besides I get the impression I cannot post any source without someone saying the source is unreliable.