this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
314 points (99.1% liked)

World News

32351 readers
412 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago (3 children)

For people not reading the article, Twitter was facing a class action lawsuit, but they successfully sued to force employees to go through arbitration, which avoids a class action suit. Only problem is that arbitration rules say the employee has to pay a small fee for filing, but the company has to pay the arbitration costs. Twitter filed to force the costs to be split with the employee, but the organization that overseas arbitration said that's against their rules and has refused to engage in any arbitration activities that Twitter isn't paying for. The pricetag could be millions, and Twitter is simply not paying, so now the employees are suing to force Twitter to pay.

[–] bappity@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

thank you πŸ™
I wish there was a TLDR bot on Lemmy

[–] mjhagen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I’ve seen one around some places, don’t remember where though.

[–] beeng@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

I would rather keep this place bot free

[–] Tentaclius@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How forced an arbitration even legal. I don't get it.

[–] KingKRool@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

It is not legal for employees alleging sexual assault or harassment. Because Congress passed a law making that illegal. Also, it is not legal for baggage handlers, because the Supreme Court said there's an exemption for working in interstate commerce. IIRC Congress tried to ban it across the board last year, but it died in the Senate and then the House flipped so there won't be another chance for a few years at least.

[–] Poob@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago
[–] mark@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

Makes sense to me