I’m not sure what we are debating/discussing. If you’re going to claim you are a bastion of transparency and information for the general public, then no, you can’t weaponize your site and omit politically damaging information about political groups you agree with/are aligned with.

That’s not just revenge against the US. That’s failing to provide the transparency you claim to stand for. He chose to obscure information based on his own whims. How is that not an issue?

Wikileaks had their own leak and it was a very interesting read.

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If you care about transparency so much i don' think you would be here trying to belittle someone who spent the past years in jail for the sake of transparency.

[–] NotAtWork@startrek.website -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

He didn't spend years in jail, he spent years in self imposed exile because he was afraid of facing a court room.

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

they have been in jail for the past 4 years