this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
28 points (93.8% liked)

World News

32160 readers
784 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] u_tamtam@programming.dev 10 points 1 year ago

Why bring China here? This has been contentious for years and across many groups, both locals (e.g. japanese fishermen) and foreign (I don't see what gives China precedence over these concerns than any of these groups).

Though I'm no more of a nuclear waste expert than the next shitposter here, last I checked, the amount of radiation was well within safe levels (otherwise this option wouldn't be on the table), water is damn good at shielding against the effects of radiation (hence why almost all the fissile fuel is stored in some form of pool or another), and the active radioisotopes had a very short half-life (meaning that whatever impact it might still have today, it will be marginal a decade from now).

If that holds up against fact checking and scientific evidence, then by all means!