this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
45 points (89.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43947 readers
638 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 41 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Define enlightened. I think people might be more informed in certain cases, but not more enlightened.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Not the definition but an historical definition.

A philosophical movement of the 1700s that emphasized the use of reason to scrutinize previously accepted doctrines and traditions and that brought about many humanitarian reforms.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Then the answer is absolutely not.

[–] TheRaven@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I disagree. We’ve had many political revolutions overthrowing leaders, religion has been on a heavy decline, and most people accept that science or basic logic is the most important element in an argument, not authority.

We just see so many people NOT doing that, and we hate it. We live in a world where the person doing the stupidest thing that day makes the front page, and we’re enlightened enough to critique it.

Stupid people will always exist. The idea that we hear about them more now and we hate them for it actually proves we’ve become more enlightened.

[–] z00s@lemmy.world -5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Counterpoint: Trump was president.

[–] TheRaven@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Of America, not of the world. Believe it or not, there are so many other people in the world outside of America.

Also, look at the presidents of the past. America has had many pro-slavery Presidents. Trump was awful, but he wasn’t even the worst President. The fact that so many people felt he was awful also shows that America has progressed.

But back to my first point, you’re looking at a country of 350m out of 8 billion people in the world. The world has moved on from so many of the things that the US continues to struggle with. As a people, we’ve advanced much further than we’ve been in the past.

Edit: wrote a “k” not an “m” for America’s population.

The fact that you don't think Trump was the worst president makes me doubt your knowledge of US history.

[–] z00s@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"Other people were worse" has never been a good argument, much leas for presidents.

350k?

The far right is on the rise all across the world, not just the US.

He was voted in by the people, ergo, the majority is not enlightened.

[–] TheRaven@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] z00s@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago

Pretty salty there, Captain America lol

[–] nitefox@sh.itjust.works -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Counterpoints:

  • china, Russia and the whole clusterfuck that is Middle East are a thing;
  • The far right is on the rise throughout all of Europe.;
  • Polarisation of public discourse is now the norm;
[–] idiomaddict@feddit.de 1 points 9 months ago

100 years ago, the only one of those that was better was possibly the Middle East, depending on where. The Chinese and Russian populations are significantly less oppressed and more educated than they were 100 years ago, which doesn’t minimize what they’re currently going through, but 1924 was not a good year for Russia or China

[–] lordnikon@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] z00s@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

What about the oak vote?