this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
590 points (97.9% liked)

Linux

48329 readers
639 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 13 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Tab groups where natively implemented?

[–] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 45 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, they worked differently than the way Edge or Chrome do now and were in many ways superior for tab management, much more like Vivaldi’s sessions but more intuitive. I was a heavy user and so am biased. They said “just use an extension!” but it would crash and lose your session (and imo the extension works even worse today). It was really ahead of its time.

Few people used it because they didn’t advertise it or make it easily discoverable. You had to know the shortcut already through osmosis or drag the button out of the customize menu.

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1221050#c0

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Simple tab groups works better tbh. It uses the features to hide, list and manage tabs.

But a native in-line implementation would be best.

[–] chris@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

I actually prefer Chrome’s tab groups, preferring to have groups visible and one click away. Ideally the user would be able to choose whether to show or hide inactive groups.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Except it's still not available on mobile

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

True. That is an entirely different UI and also underlying browser issue. Mobile does not have Containers or process isolation.

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Very laggy and overcomplicated, but found that too!

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah it's kinda laggy but does its job. I guess that was the reason why did they remove it from Firefox, it was slowing things down.

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] muhyb@programming.dev 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Never used Epiphany as my main browser but it's nice to have it around as an another open-source browser project. Gotta check that feature.

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I mean, why not use Geckoview? Mozilla is doing something really nice and has the only full fledged browser with actual Addon support. Meanwhile GNOME and KDE have half-baked projects that use engines only really maintained by Google and Apple.

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I don't understand that either. It can be used for something like Electron to run web-like programs but no one does that too.

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Well, Thunderbird does that. Thats it. Seamonkey and how they were all called were before my time.

[–] sugartits@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Over there! In the past!