this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
93 points (92.7% liked)

Asklemmy

43945 readers
638 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is a debate, not an argument, let's be adults about this. [Insert political joke]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Railison@aussie.zone 10 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Isn’t the UK plug like how it is because of the awful ring circuits in buildings built after the war? Otherwise could we have RCDs and overload protection at the switchboard?

As an Australian I’ll stand in solidarity with the UK on having switches for each power socket – immensely convenient.

I have no opinion on my country’s plug, it seems to work well and not grip loosely. But I’m open to being convinced that others are better.

I am convinced the Danish power socket contributes to national happiness.

[–] federalreverse@feddit.de 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

switches for each power socket – immensely convenient.

Admittedly, that's pretty awesome. I don't understand why these sockets with power switches are not common elsewhere.

[–] derphurr@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Well there's cost. Think about how many outlets in an office or home.

You may not understand the engineering of "UL" or safe switches because they would have to have full current of a short going through them, you have arcing, lifetime toggles, the ozone weakening the molded plastic, etc.

With most outlets (receptacles) there is a solid copper bar that goes from the wall wires to the part that pushes against the prongs of the plug. With a switch it's slightly more complicated and would you only break the hot? What if someone wired outlet backwards?

Sure you could make every plug involve a fuse, circuit breaker, arc fault, GFCI, and a switch. And a USB transformer and nightlight.

It could help though in many homes if you had only one outlet wired to a switch, and could help with parasitic current draws of almost everything modern.

[–] Ross_audio@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Don't overestimate the cost

https://www.screwfix.com/p/lap-13a-2-gang-dp-switched-plug-socket-white-5-pack/49620

That's the retail price for 5, including tax.

Trade will be 20% cheaper if not more for buying in bulk.

If I moved to the states, my home would get switches on outlets.

[–] derphurr@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You wouldn't because they don't exist outside of switch in place of top outlet you could wire to control one outlet.

But honestly the US already has switches on many outlets, because GFCI is required near water and some bedrooms, so the GFCI outlet can act like a switch with the test button

[–] Ross_audio@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

They absolutely do exist. I'd just have to install them.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Sure you could make every plug involve a fuse, circuit breaker, arc fault, GFCI, and a switch. And a USB transformer and nightlight.

Now I want plugs with nightlights so they're easier to find...

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Admittedly, that’s pretty awesome. I don’t understand why these sockets with power switches are not common elsewhere.

Because they solve a problem that ~nobody has for ~all their sockets.

Think about it: How many of your sockets do you actually use the switch on? 10%? 5%? Less?

It's smarter to put switches only where they are needed, after all every component in a circuit decreases efficiency and maintainability.

[–] Railison@aussie.zone 4 points 10 months ago

I suppose it’s a use you never realised you needed until you have it. Here are some examples off the top of my head:

  • Sandwich press stays in same place, doesn’t have an on/off button. Just flick switch and no need to unplug when not in use.
  • Power strip for the TV is wedged behind a credenza. Need to power cycle everything plugged into it but would need to move the whole credenza to unplug it. Flick the switch with a stick or arm and it’s done.
  • Using power tools and want to be sure they definitely won’t turn on while adjusting them: flick the switch and no need to unplug.
[–] Ross_audio@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

https://www.screwfix.com/p/lap-13a-2-gang-dp-switched-plug-socket-white-5-pack/49620

These things last decades. Even the cheapest ones.

A switch should never reduce efficiency any more than the distance in extra wire (a couple of centimetres at most).

If it does I don't know how you've found one cheaper than an already incredibly cheap product.

[–] Atemu@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago
[–] tootnbuns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago

The schuko plug is an even better implementation of that system because it's symmetryic plug allows for more flexibility.