this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
48 points (96.2% liked)

Linux

48331 readers
639 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
48
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by flashgnash@lemm.ee to c/linux@lemmy.ml
 

I am potentially going to be able to put Linux on my work PC soon, have been using it on my personal PC and laptop quite happily with hyprland ontop of NixOS

Thinking of using NixOS for my work machine as well, however I don't want to use hyprland or even Wayland as I need this machine to be stable and reliable (Nvidia GPU)

Is I3 still the best option for this or are there better alternatives? (leaning towards I3 ontop of KDE)

I'm also somewhat tempted to just go GNOME with the forge extension as it seems the most reliable, though the tiling on that extension is far from perfect

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ScottE@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

In a word - yes - i3 is incredibly productive and customizable, but it's not for everyone. I've been using i3 with no DE or DM for about a decade. Every time I try to use a full DE like KDE, Gnome, etc, it's just so slow and bloated, and gets in the way. And there's 100's of extra packages that get installed, and be updated, that I don't use. I don't need anything but terminals (of which I have about 40 open in 12 different virtual desktops), a browser, and an editor when vim isn't enough. So for me, it's perfect and simple. I don't know what will happen when Wayland finally wins, but that's 5-10 years away before it really wins.

[–] leopold@lemmy.kde.social 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I imagine once Wayland finally wins i3 users will turn into Sway users and that's about it.

[–] wwwgem@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

When Wayland is eventually ready, I will personaly look into river. At least that's what I would do now but no doubts that by the time everybody move to Wayland there will be way more options to consider. Hopefully one will be a good replacement for bspwm.

[–] Secret300@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

I definitely do feel i3 is the easiest to understand and get into. I remember when I first started using Linux I tried awesomewm and icewm but was so confused. i3 made sense tho

[–] mcepl@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Ehm, what would be a difference for you, if you install sway?

[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago
[–] ScottE@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's a good question - I don't know, because I haven't used it. If it's 100% compatible with i3 down to its configuration and features, then sure, it's palatable.

[–] mcepl@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

https://github.com/swaywm/sway/ still claims that sway is “i3-compatible Wayland compositor”.