Asklemmy

43963 readers

1290 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

253

What are some things that Linux can't do, but Windows can? (lemmy.zip)

submitted 10 months ago by Sensitivezombie@lemmy.zip to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

549 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Aux@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (3 children)

But everyone's complaining that nothing works under Wayland. Can you guys make up your mind already?

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

Probably Nvidia users and devs that don't want Wayland. I have yet to encounter anything that doesn't work apart from things I only read about in arguments by devs who adamantly refuse Wayland for Reasons (TM)

[–] abuttandahalf@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Things do work on Wayland and often with less fuss. Those criticisms are often opinionated hardline views. Some have truth to them, but they throw the baby out with the bath water.

[–] cevn@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago

Ya, but linux can do it tho, is the important thing. Buy AMD graphics!