this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
131 points (97.1% liked)

World News

32352 readers
412 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LeZero@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Dont forget to thank RBG, who refused to retire under Obama for some fucking reason, only to get owned by COVID after officiating a wedding for some dumb liberals (while having an immune system shredded by cancer)

Well it gave us the funniest trump interview imo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knlJWu815C0

[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Downvoted by people who refuse to look at when Democrats make stupid decisions that fuck us.

I thought Lemmy was supposed to be full of tankies, not milquetoast centrist capitalist apologists....

[–] Tak@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

Just like when Dems had congress and the presidency but refused to make law to defend abortion saying the supreme court wouldn't overrule it. Oopsy poopsy.

[–] LeZero@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They can downvote away, I will never not shit on Ginsberg (also libtards infect spaces just like right wingers)

[–] 14specks@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

libtards

I'm onboard with the spirit of the post, but I encourage you to find another insult

[–] sergio@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

agree, how do you feel about shitlib?

[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I quite like "milquetoast liberals" although it has more syllables.

[–] frozen@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz -3 points 1 year ago

He's not wrong, just an asshole.

[–] Empyreus@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

If there is a minimum age in government, there needs to be a maximum. I'm over these 70 year olds running things.

[–] BassaForte@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Your hyperlink is wrong, it's pointing back to the post.

Try this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knlJWu815C0

[–] cyd@vlemmy.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

for some fucking reason

The reason is that she expected Hillary to win and the satisfaction of the first female president appointing her replacement.

It's a great example of how these justices aren't as wise or smart as they seem to think they are.

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Expecting Hillary to be a shoe-in was just so naive. I know hardly anyone democrat or republican that actually liked her.