this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
72 points (87.5% liked)

Linux

48376 readers
1675 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've installed arch Linux and liked it, but lfs and Gentoo would be too time consuming compiling everything and not doing anything during and after install. Are there any distros like arch that don't have me compiling everything?

(page 2) 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Define "advanced".

Otherwise, just go with Debian, or Linux Mint

[–] CAPSLOCKFTW@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Assuming your goal is to gain knowledge about operating systems

Try arch but without kde, gnome, xfce, lxqt... make your own DE, based on a WM of your choice. That way you'll gain lods of knowledge about how an OS interacts with the user and which applications do what.

After that, you would have to go for LFS or Tannenbaums Modern Operating Systems

[–] Aatube@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure that runs way opposite to OP's stated goal of "don't have me compiling everything"

[–] sekhat@lemmy.temporus.me 2 points 1 year ago

Not on Arch it doesn't. Almost all window managers have a package somewhere. There will be a lot of configuring, but no compiling.

[–] Frederic@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

I spent so much time compiling my own stuff, it was horrible at times, hours and hours. Now I'm using MX Linux and that's it. LFS is fun to learn a lot of things nonetheless.

[–] lckdscl@whiskers.bim.boats 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

LFS and Gentoo, you have to compile, sure... but Arch? You don't compile the kernel on vanilla Arch, if you mean packages, then just get the *-bin versions.

Edit: misunderstood your post. What's wrong with Arch and Arch-based distros?

[–] wtry@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I phrased that wrong, I just edited it to reflect what I wanted to say.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Drito@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you mean you want something like AUR but binary ? Fedora Silverblue can answers that question because their only packages are Flatpaks. MicroOs is similar.

[–] garam@lemmy.my.id 2 points 1 year ago

Fedora fedora

FEDORA

[–] Voyajer@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Opensuse Tumbleweed

[–] housepanther@lemmy.goblackcat.com -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have to shamelessly plug for Arch Linux here. I think Arch would be a great way to get into the more advanced side of Linux without quite delving into the complexities of LFS.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›