this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
58 points (73.0% liked)

World News

32352 readers
412 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sin_free_for_00_days@lemmy.one 68 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The Republican party has led the initial charge, with a series of claims about extraterrestrial life that, until recently, would have been seen as career-ending.

LOL, more distraction from one party's inability to do their freaking job. It's funny that 1) alien visitors cross unfathomable distances using what must be technology far, far, in advance of anything we have, yet "crash" and 2) These "crashes" only happen in the US, or the US quickly swoops in to take all evidence of this from foreign countries.

tl;dr Americans are so self-centered and narcissistic it's painful at times.

[–] pizza_rolls@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

Republicans are foaming at the mouth to cut medicare and anything else that helps people while throwing trillions at the military. This is a great justification for their dumbass base that will believe any conspiracy they are instructed to

[–] sgtnasty@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago

tl;dr Americans are so self-centered and narcissistic it’s painful at times.

imagine living here ...

[–] butthead1013@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

This is a bipartisan issue, Republicans and Democrats alike were questioning the witnesses, however I do agree with you that this is a distraction.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is this guy a "whistle blower" if he's never seen any actual evidence? So dumb.

[–] frustbox@lemmy.ml 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My interpretation is that it's mostly half-truths.

Do I think governments and militaries around the world have plans for such scenarios? Like retrieving UFOs? Yes, this seems reasonable. Do I think they have run exercises and tested those scenarios for real? Probably, yes. Most likely successfully so. Do I believe that someone with a lot of hearsay could interpret those things as "holy shit, they actually found something"? Yes, yes I do.

Is any of this proof? Nope. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

[–] Joker@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Any decent military is going have crash retrieval teams. It’s called CSAR - combat search and rescue. If a Russian or Chinese jet crashes somewhere neutral, we are going to race to get there. If it’s our own F-35, we will get there even faster and probably fight anyone who tries to get there first. I imagine you would do this for any interesting craft that crashes.

[–] frustbox@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Exactly, and when something crashes in the ocean it might be full off sea weed errr, I mean non-human biologics. And if equipment from foreign nations were recovered of course they'd get reverse engineered.

Knowing how secretive militaries tend to be about their missions … of course the whistleblower gets stonewalled when trying to inquire about it.

I haven't seen a single claim that couldn't be explained with something mundane.

[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

show me proof. the talking is fine but I need evidence.

[–] atlasraven31@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Neil deGrasse Tyson said if you get taken up to a UFO, you should steal something.

[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

what do you have to lose? they probably already took your dignity during the experiments. might as well take something back.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 8 points 1 year ago

Just clench at the right moment.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Thats probably why I never get abducted, I'm def the type to steal some shit from people who kidnap me.

[–] Alto@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Ngl I wouldn't risk pissing then off

[–] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Non-human biologics? Like plants? Or maybe bugs? Or how about a weasel?

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

They found Laika

[–] kiwifoxtrot@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Bacteria is my guess.

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 3 points 1 year ago

Tardigrade perhaps.

[–] Frederic@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Non-human, so it could be a dog or a monkey?

[–] Durotar@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Not only clickbait, but also:

Updated 21h ago

There's nothing new to discuss.

[–] jsveiga@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Quite vague. Nonhuman biologics can be anything. Grass, bacteria, mold, cats...

Noneartly biologics would be more interesting.

[–] atlasraven31@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

The aliens look just like us but are attracted to positions of power and clearly have no idea how their job works.

[–] MDKAOD@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

This is weird. Like, so weird.

[–] Seigest@lemmy.ca -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have a few interpretations if this based on my limited understanding if it.

I think the oversite committee has to hear him out. Ignoring a complaint from multiple members of military about potential misappropriation of funding would be egregious on their part. So they are listening to everything and trying to be professional about it.

Now the cynic in me believes this is actually a genius way to push pulp. If this guy writes a book (assuming he hasn't already) he's just given himself enormous credibility and advertising at little to no cost. Loud enough to be heard but vague enough that he can't be disproven or take on any accountability.

But the conspiracy theorist in me just sees this as an attempt to discredit and humiliate this and other sub committee's. Ammo that can be used to try and shut it down or prevent them from more serious work.

Though I'm a Candain and only getting bits and pieces of this story so I'm probably way off base here.

[–] deft@ttrpg.network 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i watched the thing. multiple times they ask him questions that he responds with a willingness to answer in a closed session, especially about individuals and companies tied to this dark funding shit

[–] Seigest@lemmy.ca -5 points 1 year ago

That whould definitely alter my speculations. Assuming we actually hear about anything said during this closed session.

Of course he could walk into the closed meeting room emit a loud 23 second fart, then leave without a word. If the public isn't privvy to what happens in that meeting he can claim to have said whatever he wants and never get disproven.

load more comments
view more: next ›