this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
-31 points (26.2% liked)

World News

32352 readers
412 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/4112192

Men that carried out terrorist attack on concert in Russia received funds from Ukraine.

Source

Source Archive

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aleph@lemm.ee 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Source is RT straight from the mouth of the Russian Investigative Committee.

Smells like pure Kremlin propaganda, tbh.

[–] retrolasered@lemmy.zip -1 points 8 months ago

The proof is in the putin

[–] Trent@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Your unsourced claims seem completely legit and have absolutely convinced me...

[–] DengistDonnieDarko@hexbear.net 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

the source for the claim is in the post stalin-approval

[–] Trent@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You mean RT? Lol, no...gonna have to do a lot better than that.

[–] DengistDonnieDarko@hexbear.net 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Just because you disagree with it doesn't mean the claim was unsourced!

[–] Trent@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

True. It was a lot shorter than typing "This is sourced, but RT is the media arm of the Kremlin and about as reliable as the National Enquirer. And definitely shouldn't be trusted when russia stands to directly gain from painting ukraine as a bunch of terrorists. Especially when a known terrorist group has already said they did it." though. YMMV.

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 9 points 8 months ago (3 children)

The only sources you would accept are shit from CIA cutouts and pro western media anyway so what is the point?

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There isn't. Either most people have bought into a conspiracy theory or you have. It makes communication kind of pointless.

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Examining the preponderance of evidence and coming to the most reasonable conclusion isn't a conspiracy theory bud.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 8 months ago

When I said "either or", I really meant it.

[–] Trent@lemmy.ml -1 points 8 months ago

Not sure, you're the one commenting at me, not the other way around. In any case, I'm out. Best of luck convincing people with RT though.

[–] kzhe@lemmy.zip -2 points 8 months ago

What? No, the reason RT is bad is because it's specifically Russian government bad. It's like Qatar and Al-Jazeera, but even less distance.

The problem is not that RT is not CIA controlled or that it's not pro western, it's that it's literally one of the parties involved.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

You'll have to forgive me if I don't trust Russian state news reporting what the Russian investigative service says.

[–] kzhe@lemmy.zip 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

RT is Russian controlled, this is like trusting All Jazeera saying "Qatar is good"

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 8 months ago

Worse, actually, because Qatar at least tries to keep some distance. RT is Facts & Arguments but in English.

[–] p3e7@lemm.ee -2 points 8 months ago

Fake news, but great to have this info here. It‘s always good to know what is going on everywhere.