Privacy

32120 readers

396 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

195

Young People Should Oppose the Kids Online Safety Act (US-specific) (www.eff.org)

submitted 1 year ago by jdp23@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/1163015

EFF writes:

KOSA has laudable goals, but it also presents significant unintended consequences that threaten the privacy, safety, and access to information rights of young people and adults alike. Teenagers already understand that this sweeping legislation is more about censorship than safety. Now we just need to make sure Congress does, as well.

Take action! If you're in the US, Use EFF's page to Tell Congress: KOSA Will Censor the Internet But Won't Help Kids

And please help get the word out! Four ways to hep:

Cross-post this link to communities and magazines where it's on-topic

Upvote and share the other links in !bad_internet_bills@lemmy.sdf.org

If you're on Mastodon, check out the #KOSA hashtag and boost the posts you see there

Tell your friends on other social networks as well.

all 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] PenguinJuice@kbin.social 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Any time I hear "kids online" or "kids safety act" I immediately know it's vile ass shit being pushed through.

[–] jdp23@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago

Yeah really. Think of the children!!!!

[–] lemzinger75@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

No doubt - these bill names are chosen deliberately to not only deceive the public about the intentions, but also elicit an emotional reaction by those who read it. It's absolutely sickening.

[–] LiesSlander@beehaw.org 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I get that the EFF has to say this bill has "laudable goals" for political reasons, but that couldn't be further from the truth. Protecting children is a typical excuse for broad expansion of State power, and this is no different. Don't be fooled, and remember it's the democrats who are trying to push this through. Both major political parties in the US are enemies to personal autonomy, one is just more subtle about it. Liberation will never come from within the ruling power structure.

[–] SoManyChoices@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Mostly, the “laudable goals” language is to shut down the think of the children argument because everyone knows this isn’t really about that.

If they started off denigrating the bill without acknowledging the stated intent, you end up with the nonsense of my favorite radio commercial of the moment. I don’t even remember what it’s for but the following exchange cracks me up.

A: Think of the children.

B: The children aren’t what’s important right now.

A: Fine. Forget the children.

B: No. That’s worse.

….

[–] UsernameLost@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

As usual, the title of the bill has absolutely nothing to do with the contents of it.