this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
384 points (86.8% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35563 readers
1205 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Shieldtoad@sh.itjust.works 103 points 11 months ago (3 children)

They're right, a beach house isn't a dream. It's a nightmare.

Your house will constantly get sand inside. If there is a bit of wind your house gets sandblasted. You can't eat outside or seagulls will steal your food. Walking on sand is more difficult than walking on pavement or grass. You would have to be a madman to go live on a beach.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 33 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I guess it depends on where the beach house is located. I stayed at a beach house in San Diego for a week once in my 20's, and it was fucking amazing! That was one of the most fun weeks of my entire life. The short 2' wall in-between the beach and the house kept all of the sand out, and there weren't any seagulls. We sat on the porch drinking beer, BBQing, and inviting people who walked past to join us. It was paradise.

[–] skydivekingair@lemmy.world 42 points 11 months ago

Sounds more like a vacation than living there. I think I’d like a beach house but probably wouldn’t after a month or two.

[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (7 children)

Sand is also hot as fuck especially during the summer. I'm from New Jersey and I'm used to the sand being really hot on the beach during the late summer, to the point that you can barely stand on it.

I went down to South Florida during August and standing on the sand in bare feet was like standing on hot coals.

Edit: rereading this reminded me that even standing on the concrete outside of the pool in early August was unbearable. I initially didn't wear my sandals out because the entrance to the pool area from our hotel was like 100 feet and it was like 15-20 feet from the door to the water. BIG MISTAKE. It was probably the same temperature as the sand. I wouldn't doubt that the sand was 130F.

This article about South Beach said the said was 137F this August, around the time I was down there

[–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Simple answer is to buy a beach house in Scotland then

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Also the sea salt will wreck electronics causing them to fail faster.

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 64 points 11 months ago

Seriously... There is nothing mild about this.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 38 points 11 months ago (6 children)

A quick google search shows that this is fake....

[–] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 153 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It's real in that this was actually produced by an Israeli construction company. It's fake in that this isn't actually happening or approved by the state.

[–] deleted@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

The fact that the company did this and the government didn’t do anything about it gives me nazi vibes.

Add this to IDF and you get the big picture.

Also, Hitler wasn’t a bad guy overnight btw.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

It's fake in that this isn't actually happening or approved by the state.

Yet. It isn’t happening yet. Them settlers will pay a premium for that beachfront. (Also, I’m reminded of that IDF instagram … uh… person… who posted something about “I need to come back in a bikini”

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 50 points 11 months ago

Source? Because the company who posted this didn't deny and basically doubled back after saying it's a "joke"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] hal_5700X@lemmy.world 33 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Hey, it's Cyberpunk 2077's Pacifica in the making.

[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

From Pacifica? That trash from the sea no good, make you sick

[–] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 33 points 11 months ago

Not the best moment to speak the quiet part (the robbery of land) out loud. Israeli society is falling into such a spiral of collective madness that many of them don't even realize how psychotic all of this is to the rest of the world.

[–] iquanyin@lemmy.world 26 points 11 months ago

how do we know it’s real tho? who is the company running this ad and where is it running?

[–] LaserTurboShark69@sh.itjust.works 24 points 11 months ago (5 children)
[–] yggdar@lemmy.world 60 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Sadly, yes. On the off chance you speak Dutch, here is a fact-checking article on that exact ad. I know it's a weird thing to link articles in uncommon languages, but I came across that article recently and thought it really provided a lot of context, so I'm afraid it's the best source I have. You can always run it through a translator too :-)

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 42 points 11 months ago (2 children)

From Google Translate:

CHECK - Yes, an Israeli construction company posted "beach house in Gaza" ads online Advertisements from an Israeli property developer promoting construction plans in Gaza are going viral online. Many people doubt the authenticity of the images. But they are real. The construction company confirms to VRT NWS that it placed the campaign online, but states that it is "satire". At the same time, the company reports that it is in favor of the idea.

There has been a lot of commotion online in recent days about simulation images of possible construction projects in Gaza. In particular, it concerns an image with a sketch of houses in a row on top of the ruins of Gaza. In Hebrew it carries the following message: “A house on the beach is not a dream .”

Some posts with the images were shared more than 400,000 times. Many Internet users condemn the publication of images of Israeli construction projects in Gaza, which is now in ruins. Others ask whether these are real images. Our editorial staff also received that question. What do we know?

The advertisements with images of possible construction plans in Gaza were indeed made by the Israeli project developer Harey Zahav. The images were published on December 13 on both the company's Instagram page and Facebook page. They have not posted the images on their website for the time being.

There is also a caption in Hebrew below the photo. Translated it reads: “ We at Harey Zahav, are working to pave the way for a return to Gush Katif. A number of our employees went to work restoring the area, clearing debris and driving out intruders. We hope that in the near future all the people who were kidnapped will be returned safely to their homes, and our soldiers will return home and we will be able to start construction in the Gaza Strip, in the entire region of Gush Katif ."

As a reminder, Gush Katif was a block of Israeli settlements established in the Gaza Strip in the 1970s. In 2005, Israel withdrew from the Gaza Strip and removed Israeli settlers.

It is not the only image on the company's social media that talks about possible plans in Gaza. In another image, published on Instagram on December 11, we see names for the possible future settlements, such as Maale Atzmona or Neve Katif. They were marked on a map of the Gaza Strip.

Harey Zahav, the Israeli construction developer who until now has mainly specialized in the construction of homes in the settlements on the West Bank, admits in a response to VRT NWS that it published the images.

“We launched this campaign to increase awareness and discussion about the solution we consider right and sustainable,” said Zeev Epshtein, the company's owner, in a Dec. 18 email. "The campaign is of course not a real commercial campaign. It is a satire. It is up to the Israeli government to decide to return to Gaza. Until that decision is made, no real construction projects can start."

Speaking to Israeli media company Mako, Ephstein said the publication was "a cross between a joke and wishful thinking ". In addition to the images with possible construction plans, the Israeli company has also published many images on its social media since October 7 to highlight the efforts of the Israeli army.

[–] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 11 months ago

CHECK - Yes, an Israeli construction company posted “beach house in Gaza” ads online Advertisements from an Israeli property developer promoting construction plans in Gaza are going viral online. Many people doubt the authenticity of the images. But they are real. The construction company confirms to VRT NWS that it placed the campaign online, but states that it is “satire”.

They should have stopped there.

At the same time, the company reports that it is in favor of the idea.

[–] Meron35@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What if we constructed beach houses in Gaza? Lol kj... unless?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 23 points 11 months ago

Translated by Google:

[–] NinePeedles@sh.itjust.works 21 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Wow. That's bold. They said the quote part out loud. When the US invaded the Middle East it was only a poorly kept secret that it was for oil.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] unreasonabro@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

Pretty sunny considering its so fucking dark

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

The atrocities committed to have more of our mother's skin.

[–] BloodSlut@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (2 children)

the use of the word 'dream' makes this seem ambiguous. i still cant really tell if this is pro or anti-settler?

i feel like it could either be interpreted as saying "a beach house is not positive" or as "a beach house could be a reality"

i hope its the first, it would be really sick otherwise

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 11 points 11 months ago (3 children)

That's gotta be bad advertising, surely? Like, even someone who hates the people who currently live there and so doesn't feel horrible about contributing to forcing them out, is still not going to want to go build in the ruins of a warzone I'd imagine?

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 33 points 11 months ago

The way some Israelis talk about Palestinians make it clear they see them as less than animals. It's pretty disgusting.

[–] yggdar@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I like your optimism, but no, they are actually serious.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Diprount_Tomato@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

They're already doing the same thing in the West Bank

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Racist genocide aside... that's just poor city planning.

[–] kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Housing company makes stupid ads for more housing

More at eleven

[–] iquanyin@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

ads for land while they are bombing and starving the citizens of that land and claiming to be only hunting hamas. context: it tells you what things mean.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

There's no pic?

Edit: ok maybe I just had slow internet

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›