this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
207 points (97.7% liked)

Linux

48376 readers
1661 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Distributions nowadays are defined by their desktop bling :(

It used to be that you could just install whatever desktop you fancied on pretty much any distro.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] spaphy@lemmy.ml -1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

More people should start charging for their work and actually staffing security. I like zorin just for the fact that I have expectations for items I pay for where things that are free I can't really hold accountable.

I know that's antiFOSS but I'm somewhere in the middle lately. I want to pay for quality but still be able to tinker with it.

[–] zagaberoo@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What do you mean? Payment isn't anti-FOSS at all, it's just a lot harder to make money when the source is libre.

[–] spaphy@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

I'm glad you think so. I remember Richard stallman banging on a bongo singing that charging for software is greed.

I just want people to have enough incentives for their time that things are safe and the workers paid properly. I wish more open source devs got paid.

[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

That's not exactly anti-FOSS, to my understanding, since the "free" part refers to freedom. As long as after you pay you are free to use the software as you want and get access to the source code, I think it might still count as FOSS? And then, of course, there's the option of paid support on free (of charge) software, though I think recent events might suggest that's not really sustainable.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›