this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
59 points (100.0% liked)

Daystrom Institute

3457 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to Daystrom Institute!

Serious, in-depth discussion about Star Trek from both in-universe and real world perspectives.

Read more about how to comment at Daystrom.

Rules

1. Explain your reasoning

All threads and comments submitted to the Daystrom Institute must contain an explanation of the reasoning put forth.

2. No whinging, jokes, memes, and other shallow content.

This entire community has a “serious tag” on it. Shitposts are encouraged in Risa.

3. Be diplomatic.

Participate in a courteous, objective, and open-minded fashion. Be nice to other posters and the people who make Star Trek. Disagree respectfully and don’t gatekeep.

4. Assume good faith.

Assume good faith. Give other posters the benefit of the doubt, but report them if you genuinely believe they are trolling. Don’t whine about “politics.”

5. Tag spoilers.

Historically Daystrom has not had a spoiler policy, so you may encounter untagged spoilers here. Ultimately, avoiding online discussion until you are caught up is the only certain way to avoid spoilers.

6. Stay on-topic.

Threads must discuss Star Trek. Comments must discuss the topic raised in the original post.

Episode Guides

The /r/DaystromInstitute wiki held a number of popular Star Trek watch guides. We have rehosted them here:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Numerically speaking, the vast majority of Ferengi we see on screen are sporting what have sometimes been called “headskirts”. Virtually every Ferengi we see on-screen — from the marauder crewmen in Next Generation to Quark’s waiters to various Ferengi businessmen seen in the background — is wearing one. Rom and Nog even wear color-coordinated versions of them once they join the Bajoran militia and Starfleet, respectively.

However, there are a few conspicuous exceptions to this otherwise apparently universal practice, most notably among them being Quark, the only Ferengi character billed as a series lead. This is particularly jarring, as Quark otherwise frames himself as the most Ferengi Ferengi around.

From a real-world perspective, I suspect that the headskirts were originally created to avoid creating a full head prosthetic for guest actors. Once the character of Quark was created, the cost of a reusable full head prosthetic would have been less prohibitive.

In universe, after reviewing which Ferengi are shown with and without headskirts, I believe I have a theory that fits what we’re shown on-screen, and gives us some grounds to infer a few extra bits about certain characters.

First, I propose that the “default” practice for Ferengi is to wear a headskirt. That would explain why we see them worn so frequently. However, I suggest that it is an option to abstain from a headskirt — under certain conditions.

Fundamentally, I propose that the absence of a headskirt indicates that a Ferengi believes he is a “top dog” — in that he has no one above him who could be considered his “boss.” However, I also suggest that there is some subjectivity and risk in this. (Note that “top dog” is not a coincidental choice of words on my part: the Ferengi logo is said to have been drawn to describe the “dog eat dog eat dog” mentality of a capitalist society.)

Zek and Gint are the clearest examples of this: as Grand Nagus, they are the pinnacle “top dog.”

Quark would also fit this criterion: Odo, Kira and Sisko aside, there basically is no one whom Quark answers to (unlike his waiters, who answer to him). Rom and Nog do not fit this criterion, for a few different reasons. Nog is a child at the series start before starting essentially an apprenticeship on his way to joining Starfleet; and obviously once he joins Starfleet, he continues to have those who outrank him. Rom answers to his brother before joining the station’s maintenance crew, at which point he ultimately answers to O’Brien.

There are several other Ferengi who do not wear headskirts, and it definitely is not a clean and tidy division between the bosses and the workers. However, that is where some subjectivity comes in. Rather than being a hard-and-fast rule, the absence (or presence) of a headskirt may be an assertion: “I’m a top dog and I dare you to say otherwise.” It then turns to one’s peers to decide if the claim is justified; if you make the claim but then don’t have the status to back it up, then you lose credibility and standing. So removing one’s headskirt is not without its risk.

Who else have we seen without headskirts?

Galia: as an arms merchant who can purchase his own moon, he would likely be seen as a “deserving top dog” — perfectly reasonable for him to abandon the headskirt.

Brunt: an FCA liquidator, his bare head takes on some new significance in this framework. The FCA is described as “answering to no one” — if that is true, then Brunt’s bare head would serve to reinforce that idea to all those misfortunate enough to cross his path. It’s also possible that liquidators are supposed to answer to someone — a manager or the like — but that Brunt goes bald anyway, just to flaunt his de facto latitude.

Nilva: as the chairman of a large Ferengi company, he likewise probably enjoys “deserving top dog” status.

Reyga: a Ferengi scientist and a bit of a maverick; we might interpret his bare head as indicating some level of rejection of Ferengi norms; if my proposed framework is true, then it is a louder act of protest than we would otherwise realize

Prak: though I doubt this was an intentional choice on the part of the showrunners (I suspect his bare head is the result of extra prosthetics being available from the concurrent production of DS9), Prak does give us an interesting example of someone who perhaps is “too big for his britches” — it is rare to see a DaiMon without a headskirt (presumably because they must answer to some sort of Ferengi admiral), but it’s easy to imagine a DaiMon who is cocky enough to flaunt their bare head — and is probably ridiculed by all his underlings for it. (Recall how Starfleet Captain Styles in The Search For Spock has been mocked for his swagger stick.)

There are several Ferengi whom we might expect to go bare under this framework who still wear the headskirt. Chief among these is Lek, who by his own admission works alone. Lek probably could justify “top dog” status if he wanted to. But the default is to wear a headskirt: to go bare is to make an active statement, and thereby draw attention to oneself. I imagine there are more than a few Ferengi who could justify their own “top dog” status but who would rather keep a lower profile (Rule of Acquisition 168: “Whisper your way to success”).

~ ~ ~

What do you think? Are there any good counter-examples to this? (I admit, I did not check the appearance of every Ferengi in every episode. So it’s possible that I missed someone!) Is this consistent with other things we’ve seen in Ferengi society? Are there any other possible explanations for the pattern of skirted vs bare heads?

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HairHeel@programming.dev 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder if a head skirt is part of a way to signal limited liability as well. It tells your customers “you’re not making this business deal with me, but with my boss/organization” with the implication that any problems or tricky negotiations will need to be escalated to the top dog.

My question is, at what rank in Starfleet will it be socially acceptable for Nog to take his skirt off? Captain or Admiral? Captains have a great deal of autonomy, so I’d bet that’s an ok place for it.

[–] Equals@startrek.website 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So, this may be a hot take but… I’d argue that Nog will never serve in Starfleet without the headskirt. Setting aside the fact that he’ll always have someone above him the chain of command, I’d suggest that Nog would believe that it’s an articulation of Starfleet ideals via Ferengi custom for him to never take off the headskirt. Why? Because Starfleet is about service to others and to each other. Nog would argue that becoming (or asserting status as) “top dog” is antithetical to Starfleet ideals; keeping the headskirt becomes a continued reminder to him of his duty.

[–] DaSaw@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

Kind of like how the English language ditched it's informal pronouns entirely as egalitarian (or at least bourgeois) norms took hold, a declaration that all are worth of the respect indicated by the use of the formal "you" (and "ye"), rather than distinguishing between "you" and "thou".

[–] slashzero@hakbox.social 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From a real-world perspective, I suspect that the headskirts were originally created to avoid creating a full head prosthetic for guest actors. Once the character of Quark was created, the cost of a reusable full head prosthetic would have been less prohibitive.

Your suspicion is correct. Several behind the scenes videos and past producers have confirmed this as the main reason. Not only cost, but time needed to do the full head makeup.

[–] DaSaw@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

Time is a cost, as is space and location. I know this might seem needlessly pedantic, but the inability to conceptualize this fact leads to many an error in economic thinking, not only among laymen, but also among academics.

[–] GlimmervoidG@startrek.website 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's an interesting theory but I do worry a bit about 'over fitting', where everything must have a complex lore explanation.

Go outside and walk down the street. Some women have earrings. Some don't. Is there some secret code to this? No, not really. It's mostly personal choice. Oh we can take some signals from earrings and their lack. Social class, subculture etc. But these are soft signals that will be wrong as they are right.

I'd suspect headskirts are similar. They're a fashion choice that some wear and so don't. It might hit at subculture but I think it's something more arcane than 'top dog'.

[–] FreeFacts@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree. I have always thought that it ties into the ferengi lobe obsession. Big lobes is seen as "manly" in their culture, and the headskirt actually makes the lobes stand out more. Then there are ferengi who feel like they don't need to make their lobes stand out for various of reasons.

[–] LibraryLass@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago

This leads me to wonder what Ferengi think of pierced ears.

[–] ryan@the.coolest.zone 9 points 1 year ago

Great theory! Framing it as a social convention that requires one to be powerful enough (or to feel powerful enough) to break makes a lot of sense.

Similarly, in the US hats were a social norm and a class signifier for a long time. The practice slowed in the 1940s (apparently the Hat Research Foundation found that, in 1947, 19% of men who didn't wear hats said it was due to trauma associated with war uniforms) and then declined significantly further when JFK was interviewed and shown on the news without wearing a hat. (source)

Perhaps, at the time we're looking at Ferengi society, they are undergoing a similar transition in headwear societal conventions. It starts with the powerful breaking convention, and begins filtering its way down through society.

[–] buckykat@lemmy.fmhy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

This is an interesting observation. In hew-mons the size and elaborateness of head coverings usually correlates positively with status

[–] sailing_bookdragon@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I love your theory. The real world one looks true to me as well. But it is your in-world one that sounds so intriguing. And quite possible true.

the biggest weak spot I can think of is that some of the ferengi gathered at the convention to discuss the Gamma Quadrant (DS9 The Nagus) are wearing headskirts. Of course your (in-world) explanation about them not feeling secure enough to go bare, could work always. And I am not sure of their roles in the ferengi society either.

[–] DaSaw@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

Time is a cost, as is space. I know this might seem needlessly pedantic, but the inability to conceptualize this fact leads to many an error in economic thinking, not only among laymen, but also among academics.