this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
254 points (89.2% liked)

Asklemmy

43947 readers
638 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 8) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

In my country, educated just means you came from money, and did some busy work. Largely idiots tbh.

[โ€“] stochasticity@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

"Education is how privilege is laundered into merit."

[โ€“] goat@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago

Coming to absolutes and never admitting your faults

[โ€“] Valbrandur@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Thinking about different languages in the terms of "useful" or "useless" according to the number of speakers they have.

Edit: What I mean specifically is not for someone to want or not to personally learn a language, but if the existance in itself of a language is more or less valuable according to how many people speak it (per example and as I explained below, believing that Occitan's existance is useless because there's already French to talk to Occitan people with, who already understand it). Yes, this happens.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ