this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
904 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

63375 readers
5788 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Update: After this article was published, Bluesky restored Kabas' post and told 404 Media the following: "This was a case of our moderators applying the policy for non-consensual AI content strictly. After re-evaluating the newsworthy context, the moderation team is reinstating those posts."

Bluesky deleted a viral, AI-generated protest video in which Donald Trump is sucking on Elon Musk’s toes because its moderators said it was “non-consensual explicit material.” The video was broadcast on televisions inside the office Housing and Urban Development earlier this week, and quickly went viral on Bluesky and Twitter.

Independent journalist Marisa Kabas obtained a video from a government employee and posted it on Bluesky, where it went viral. Tuesday night, Bluesky moderators deleted the video because they said it was “non-consensual explicit material.”

Other Bluesky users said that versions of the video they uploaded were also deleted, though it is still possible to find the video on the platform.

Technically speaking, the AI video of Trump sucking Musk’s toes, which had the words “LONG LIVE THE REAL KING” shown on top of it, is a nonconsensual AI-generated video, because Trump and Musk did not agree to it. But social media platform content moderation policies have always had carve outs that allow for the criticism of powerful people, especially the world’s richest man and the literal president of the United States.

For example, we once obtained Facebook’s internal rules about sexual content for content moderators, which included broad carveouts to allow for sexual content that criticized public figures and politicians. The First Amendment, which does not apply to social media companies but is relevant considering that Bluesky told Kabas she could not use the platform to “break the law,” has essentially unlimited protection for criticizing public figures in the way this video is doing.

Content moderation has been one of Bluesky’s growing pains over the last few months. The platform has millions of users but only a few dozen employees, meaning that perfect content moderation is impossible, and a lot of it necessarily needs to be automated. This is going to lead to mistakes. But the video Kabas posted was one of the most popular posts on the platform earlier this week and resulted in a national conversation about the protest. Deleting it—whether accidentally or because its moderation rules are so strict as to not allow for this type of reporting on a protest against the President of the United States—is a problem.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Bluesky had better take care that they not act like other cowardly tech media

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sighofannoyance@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago (28 children)

Simple solution to all this crap:

MASTODON.

load more comments (28 replies)
[–] thisphuckinguy@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

Bluesky is BS

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Their moderation has been garbage lately. They're wrongly banning people for things they didn't do. It's just premusk twitter at this point. The real fediverse is a better vet medium and long term

[–] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's just premusk twitter at this point.

I mean, given that Jack Dorsey founded it as basically the "not Twitter Twitter" after musk bought the main one, I don't think it's surprising to see it face basically the same moderation issues in the name of being "even-handed"

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 30 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Re-upload it 100 times over..fuck em

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 20 points 2 days ago

Throw it on peertube/other platforms. haha

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ToiletFlushShowerScream@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Hopefully this amplifies the videos exposure. Is it because it is considered explicit that it's not tolerated like other forms of parody?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] puppinstuff@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Explicit? Hardly. Just two good pals suckin’ toe.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Geobloke@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Why is it "very very stupid"?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›