this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2025
113 points (98.3% liked)

World News

40161 readers
4806 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump’s overhaul of U.S. foreign aid has thrown USAID into turmoil, forcing contractors to fire staff and struggle with unpaid invoices.

His administration halted aid projects and tasked Elon Musk with downsizing USAID, leading to layoffs and funding freezes.

Contractors face millions in unpaid dues, with some considering legal action. The cuts have disrupted global health and humanitarian programs, sparking protests.

USAID funding, less than 1% of the U.S. budget, is key to diplomacy and countering China and Russia’s influence, raising concerns about long-term global impact.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hansolo@lemm.ee 13 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It's hard not to get into the weeds of this because of how complex these contracts get.

Typically, a country asks the US for help with something like developing their agriculture sector, or e-governance, or dealing with a famine. USAID doesn't do the work itself to limit government liability. So they put up a notice that says "we want proposals to do this job, in this place, and get these results. Don't go over $XX"

Bids come in, and because these are programs in developing countries, it's rare that the country had any organization capable of reliably taking on a $5 million contract with tons of legal and compliance obligations. So a lot of times US-based companies that specialize in this kind of work, staffed by people who don't mind moving their family to Malawi or wherever of necessary. Many people, both contractors and USAID staff are killed, sometimes abducted and tortured, in the course of trying to deal with humanitarian crises in dangerous places.

Because local tallent IS a cruicial part of the way these programs work, the main contracter will hire local staff, and then because no one company can do everything, they also hire small local contractors to do singular tasks, like JUST community engagement about financial planning. So unless it's a war zone (often even then), dozens, mayne even hundreds, of local jobs might come from one contract. This is a VERY reductive version of the process in general terms.

Meaning that during this aid "review" and dismantling, it's likely that 100,000 people or more, mostly in poor counties, are suddenly out of work. It's unlikely that Rubio will reinstate programs without a GOP Congressperson asking, or obvious "lives will be lost" support ends.

[–] jumperalex@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

or obvious “lives will be lost” support ends.

It's funny (not funny!) that you think they care about lives being lost.

The cruelty IS the point.

[–] hansolo@lemm.ee 2 points 22 hours ago

They care about the optics of halting obvious immediate lifesaving assistance because it makes them look like they're making "responsible" decisions.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago

observe! the plan for peace in Ukraine is there will be peace once there's no Ukraine