this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

46529 readers
1030 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

That's literally the meaning of meme or memetic; ideas are passed on like a virus. I know it's annoying to repost memes but that is the circle of memes xD

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 days ago

only one message for reposters: if you didn't make it, don't post your lazy regurgitated trash

[–] Darkenfolk@dormi.zone 0 points 3 days ago

I rather have a repost instead of all these motherfuckers only posting a link to some external website which throws a 404 error.

[–] pseudo@jlai.lu 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I am a serial crossposter. And I'll keep crossposting whether you like it or not. You will not see OC from me, my friend.

[–] WbrJr@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Crossposts Form reddit? I though about building a bot that posts the top 3 posts every day to the correspinding lemmy instance, just to get more posts here.

I Mike lemmy for its very technical posts but sometimes i would like some more shitposts here :D

[–] pseudo@jlai.lu 0 points 1 day ago

Not even... I crosspost from one Lemmy community to another.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 days ago

Maybe this already exists, but what about a feature which allows tagging a post as a link to a previous/original post, which can be used by clients to filter out reposts if desired.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 days ago

no_nothing demands only original trash for cm002 to regurgitate

[–] Azzu@lemm.ee 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

There's a simple reason why reposts will always happen, never stop: different people have seen different things. Your reposts are other people's never-seen-before content.

[–] nonfuinoncuro@lemm.ee 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

insert xkcd 10,000 people obligatory everything is a repost

[–] TehBamski@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

To be fair, I purposely didn't do a deep dive on xkcd so that whenever I did see a related post in the comments, it was almost always fresh to me. I figured this was true of a lot of people online.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

As long as I don't see "thanks stranger" and "happy cake day" I'm ok

[–] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I accept reposts are a part of the fediverse because every instance will have the same damned memes and since I'm federated with quite a few of them, I'm just gonna have to deal with it. Just my take.

[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 days ago

I feel like apps could probably aggregate posts with the same links somehow and allow users to flip between comment threads; but I have no idea how to make that work on the backend.

[–] eli@lemmings.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Lemmyers are just redditors that have marginally more care for privacy. The venn diagram is nearly a circle

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

Lemmyers

The official term is Lemmings.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

I see we got reddit's whining about reposts.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 days ago

Moderation is a necessary evil. Otherwise everything becomes /r/Funny with different decor.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 4 days ago

There's stuff I wouldn't see otherwise because I'm not on other networks. I'm fine with bringing stuff here from elsewhere.

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 0 points 4 days ago

Bitching about reposts is of course very original

[–] Draces@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Then down vote it? Isn't that the point of that button? I'm assuming a big problem with Reddit was they wanted controversial posts seen which took away from the power of down voting but hopefully Lemmy doesn't? I don't actually know though

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Ahhh, the rallying cry of "just downvote it". I'd insert the "this your first time?" gif here if I could. Leaving a community to self moderate invariably turns into a popularity contest, and then when one group eventually takes over, an echo chamber usually filled with the same regurgitated spam. "If you don't like it just downvote it" or it's reverse "well it has a lot of upvotes, so someone must like it"(welcome to why we have so many bots today....) always ends up catering to the terminally online at the detriment of the average person. People far too often will speak with absolute confidence about things they have never even experienced, but because it's well formatted, it's sent to the top. The Gell-Mann Amnesia effect describes this in part.

[–] Draces@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This site is maybe the worst echo chamber I've ever experienced it's just one that suites my opinions. Hell even if I agree with the echo chamber but I'm the wrong way it gets rejected aggressively. If you think it's bots then that seems like a more legitimate complaint but if it's a repost getting enough upvotes and is not weighted for controversy then it's actually the terminally online people that know every post suffering with their obsession and not the community at large. I completely disagree with that theory

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So when I wrote about bots, I was describing them as an effect created by a cause. You went and reversed the two and are thinking I blamed bots.

No.

What I said was that voting based moderation is a popularity contest. An easy way to win popularity contests is to stuff the ballot. On the internet, you can do this with bots. Ergo, the rise in bots all over the Internet is a consequence of our popularity based algorithms and systems. That type of moderation just doesn't work. But please, keep misunderstanding people and then blaming others. I'm sure that'll help.

If you're gonna disagree with my idea, at least get it right. You're not being downvotted heavily for not agreeing with the hive mind in the right way. You're being downvotted for lacking reading comprehension and going off on a crazy sounding tangent.

[–] Draces@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I did not misunderstand your bot theory but good to see you prove my "even if I agree" point lmao

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You ended your comment saying you completely disagree with me after reiterating what I'd just said as if it were your own thought.

You really need to work on your communication and reading comprehension buddy.

[–] Draces@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you think it’s bots then that seems like a more legitimate complaint

An easy way to win popularity contests is to stuff the ballot. On the internet, you can do this with bots

You really need to work on your communication and reading comprehension buddy.

Maybe try a mirror bud

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Try reading the whole thing and comprehending it as a complex thought with nuance. I'll wait. Might take you awhile but I'll wait.

[–] Draces@lemmy.world -1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

On boy are you dense. I agreed if your theory that bots are to blame is correct you have a legitimate complaint I dispute that and you got really confused and angry saying I don't understand instead of anything of substance. Do you know what projection is?

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

I never said bots were the problem. I said people caring more about popularity is the problem and that once you realize this it's super easy to program bots to imitate people by up voting/down voting what you want. But yes, call me dense when you've misconstrued my argument from day one.

Edit: didn't look like my previous comment posted so I rewrote it. Considering how dense you are tho, maybe two versions will help you finally understand, so I'll just leave it.

[–] Draces@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

I never said bots were the problem

it’s super easy to program bots to imitate people

Considering how dense you are tho

Hmm...

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Because I never said bots are to blame. People are and once you realize that, programming a bot to do what people can do is super easy.

I get offended when people try to tell me I made an argument I never made. But thanks again buddy 👍

load more comments
view more: next ›