this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
210 points (98.6% liked)

World News

39626 readers
1504 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Under the UK's Online Safety Act, all websites hosting pornography, including social media platforms, must implement "robust" age verification methods, such as photo ID or credit card checks, for UK users by July.

Regulator Ofcom claims this is to prevent children from accessing explicit content, as research shows many are exposed as young as nine.

Critics, including privacy groups and porn sites, warn the measures could drive users to less-regulated parts of the internet, raising safety and privacy concerns.

(page 2) 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Remember to apply this to 4chan, UK.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

*chan, Facebook, Reddit, imgur, xitter, Lemmy, Mastodon...

well...maybe Australia had a good idea...

[–] essell@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Looks like I picked the right time to get a girlfriend

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I kinda of wonder if this is a way to try putting the sites out of business. In the US they just don't bother working in the various states with laws like this.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In the case of Texas and places like that, age verification laws are about being able to call anything they want (like LGBT+ content) “pornographic.” Texas doesn’t care if it works.

Interestingly, Pornhub actually stayed in my state, Louisiana, because — according to their Supreme Court lawyers, yesterday — we have digital IDs and it was apparently trivial to do the checks via some sort of API. Texans would have to upload a photo of their driver’s license or something and there’s major privacy issues.

Also, Louisiana’s law didn’t work. Pornhub, which wants to be mainstream, does ID checks but sketchier sites in other countries don’t. It probably just caused more teens to get malware or be exposed to truly objectionable content (like CSAM).

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

Good info, thanks

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago

No, they just want to control the internet because they are afraid of it. To be honest, it's not without reason after the Arab Spring and then the current disinformation wars.

This is not the way to do it though.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Would this be an appropriate cultural moment to pimp FUTO ID or something similar for (I think?) legitimate human online verification?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›