this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
698 points (84.2% liked)

Privacy

32784 readers
1187 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In an unexpected mask off "secure" email and VPN provider Proton took the stance of siding with the fascist MAGA Reps. Proton's services are no option for me and many others any longer. Let's collect and discuss alternatives (E2E encrypted email and VPN) here πŸ”πŸ‘‡

Always try to provide:

-Server location (jurisdiction)

-Governance

-Integrity/trustworthiness/transparency

-User experience/ease of use (grade 1 to 10, lets take Proton as a benchmark with an 8)

-Pricing and links

If you know alternative setups, feel free to share, too.

#ProtonExodus

Background: https://lemmy.ca/comment/13913116

Edit:typo

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ngn@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

this idea of if you use a product you have to support every belief the company have is absolutely insane, like why can't you recognize that a company's products and it's beliefs are two separate things? yeah the beliefs do effect the product but not all of them (especially not in this case like bro its ceos personal belief), why are we living in a time where you either have to %100 support something or you have %100 be against it? the fact that even a small political stand that someone dont agree with can turn them against a company or even a person is crazy to me

anyway i understand you made this choice and even tho i dont agree with the reasoning ill also provide 2 alternatives for vpn: mullvad and ivpn, both dont require email for account creation and accept monero payment, you probably heard them before

for email i suggest hosting your own if you have the time, there is this great project named docker-mailserver and its really easy to setup, but if you dont want to go through the effort feel free to check numerous alternatives others provided

[–] Chais@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 hours ago

the fact that even a small political stand that someone dont agree with can turn them against a company or even a person is crazy to me

Why? I try not to buy from companies that employ child or slave labour (NestlΓ©) or drain the water supply in drought regions (also NestlΓ©) or companies that support fascists (MΓΌller and apparently Proton) because voting with my wallet is the only choice I have for even a slim chance of making my opinion heard in this capitalist hellscape.

[–] sol6_vi@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

People feel like the only vote they have that matters anymore is the one they can make with their wallet. You can't tell people their politics are separate from their products when the CEO's control the government through donations and lobbying.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

this idea of if you use a product you have to support every belief the company have is absolutely insane

Where do we draw the line?

I thought kissing the ass of Trump was our canary.

[–] bradd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I agree with you but I also think it's reasonable to not do business with an organization that you disagree with for a lot of reasons. One of the simplest reasons is that you're giving someone that you disagree with more money.

I'm not a vegan myself but I understand and I appreciate how far vegans will go not to support animal cruelty. It's the same thing really, you invest in businesses that don't harm animals and so you're doing your part even if at the end of the day the slaughter houses are booming.

While I certainly agree that it's comical to expect a company to 100% support your beliefs, I'm also in favor of not using a company if the beliefs of said company are completely contrary to yours. That's why I'm not using stuff like google, microsoft, amazon etc.

Voting with your wallet is a very good thing and I fully support people who do it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UntitledQuitting@reddthat.com 88 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This may sound drastic but really I think the only move for Proton is fire Andy. They’re a non-profit, the board need to step in. He has single-handedly cost the company both current and potential customers by just not being smart enough to keep his mouth shut. This makes him an idiot, and an idiot as CEO is not a good look (see: anything musk)

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Andy Yen really dropped the ball especially because he hasn't done anything significant to really establish trust in his leadership and the biggest thing he does is tank the company image.

Dude had the easiest job in the world β€” shut up, look smart, pretend to care and delegate. Instead, he jumps head first into left vs right of US politics on Twitter of all places 🀑

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I'm not going to change from Proton because of this, but what you're suggesting is probably not a bad idea. CEOs are and should be easy to replace and mistakes like this are pretty standard reason why CEOs get booted.

edit removed some rather incriminating, unverified claims about Andy Yen

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I use mailbox.org its pretty sweet

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] the_three_tomatoes@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Why treat Proton like it's the work of a single person rather than a large team?

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

CEO's get to decide what to do with the money the company earns. The workers dont.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Companies are monarchies.

A single person speaks for that company and drives the direction of that company the workers making the product have little to no say in the overarching ideals and principles of that product.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

There was a reply from the official proton handle on mastodon doubling down on the Andy's take.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago

Because its not an unimportant person praising the fascists.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brejela@lemm.ee 46 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"Proton? Why the fuck would he be mad at a WINE fork...?"
"... OH THE MAIL-"

[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I always forget there is a hyped for-profit mail service using the same name as the game compatibility layer.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If they think Dollar Store Hitler is going to stand up for small businesses then they're about to have a rude awakening.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sma3in@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I just got settled for fuck's sake

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Oha@lemmy.ohaa.xyz 5 points 1 day ago

been using https://migadu.com/ for a few months now and its pretty great

[–] Tin@lemmy.world 63 points 2 days ago (21 children)

The CEO "apologized" this morning (after being duly chastised, I'm sure):

Hi all, last night, a post from last year from my personal X account suddenly became a topic of discussion here on Reddit. I want to share a few thoughts on this to provide clarity to the community on what is Proton's policy on politics going forward.

First, while the X post was not intended to be a political statement, I can understand how it can be interpreted as such, and it therefore should not have been made. While we will not prohibit all employees from expressing personal political opinions publicly, it is something I will personally avoid in the future. I lean left on some issues, and right on other issues, but it doesn't serve our mission to publicly debate this. It should be obvious, but I will say that it is a false equivalence to say that agreeing with Republicans on one specific issue (antitrust enforcement to protect small companies) is equal to endorsing the entire Republican party platform.

Second, officially Proton must always be politically neutral, and while we may share facts and analysis, our policy going forward will be to share no opinions of a political nature. The line between facts, analysis, and opinions can be blurry at times, but we will seek to better clarify this over time through your feedback and input.

The exception to these rules is on the topics of privacy, security, and freedom. These are necessarily political topics, where influencing public policy to defend these values, often requires engaging politically.

The operations of Proton have always reflected our neutrality. For example, recently we refused pressure to deplatform both Palestinian student groups and Zionist student groups, not because we necessarily agreed with their views, but because we believe more strongly in their right to have their own views.

It is also a legal guarantee under Swiss law, which explicitly prohibits us from assisting foreign governments or agencies, and allows us no discretion to show favoritism as Swiss law and Swiss courts have the final say.

The promise we make is that no matter your politics, you will always be welcome at Proton (subject of course to adherence to our terms and conditions). When it comes to defending your right to privacy, Proton will show no favoritism or bias, and will unconditionally defend it irrespective of the opinions you may hold.

This is because both Proton as a company, and Proton as a community, is highly diverse, with people that hold a wide range of opinions and perspectives. It's important that we not lose sight of nuance. Agreeing/disagreeing with somebody on one point, rarely means you agree/disagree with them on every other point.

I would like to believe that as a community there is more that unites us than divides us, and that privacy and freedom are universal values that we can all agree upon. This continues to be the mission of the non-profit Proton Foundation, and we will strive to carry it out as neutrally as possible.

Going forward, I will be posting via u/andy1011000. Thank you for your feedback and inputs so far, and we look forward to continuing the conversation.

Original post: https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtonMail/comments/1i2nz9v/on_politics_and_proton_a_message_from_andy/

Am I being paranoid when I notice that the binary at the end of his username translates to 88?

[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago

Wow, such a generic nonpology.

Oh, I'm so, so sorry I was caught red-handed. I apologize for anything you guys blame me for, please keep using your product.

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Am I being paranoid when I notice that the binary at the end of his username translates to 88?

Well, there's a good possibility that he might have been born in 1988. If not, then that doesn't look very good.

Personally, I think he'd be an extremely unusual neo-nazi, given his background. So perhaps a bit of Occam's Razor should be applied here.

[–] frozenspinach@lemmy.ml 40 points 2 days ago (1 children)

First, while the X post was not intended to be a political statement

Not intended to be a political statement? Even setting aside agreement vs disagreement, how is this (below) not a political statement?

10 years ago Republicans were the party of big business and Dems stood for the little guys, but today the tables have completely turned.

Again, regardless of whether you agree or disagree it's like a textbook example of a political statement.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nepenthes@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Someone in the comments there make a good point:

It is so disingenuous to say "last year" when it was a little more than a month ago.

His excuse that the social media team posted it from the official account instead of his account is farcical. This whole thing is too bad a taste in my mouth.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί