this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2025
58 points (71.3% liked)

Technology

60560 readers
3978 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Let's assume that in 10 years, AI has advanced absurdly, insanely fast, and is now capable of doing everything a Senior SWE can do. It can program in 15 different languages, 95% accuracy with almost no mistakes, can create entire applications in minutes, and no more engineers or SWEs are needed.... What will all the devs do? Do they just become homeless? Transition to medical field, nursing? Become tradespeople like plumbers, HVAC?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

Same thing the rest of us replaced by AI are gonna do: live on the dole or starve

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 5 points 6 days ago

As a dev, there's still quite a bit ai can't do and will most likely not be able to do.

AI is good at solving old problems but it's not trained on anything new. Its good at boilerplate and templates, but not good at original material. If it gets tremendously better, and really does get to the point where it's better than we are at development, then the industry will shift into prompt engineering. But I can see a huge reduction of jobs.

[–] rimjob_rainer@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Then I'll train my own model to make others lose their jobs, too. I bet an AI will then be able to do all calculations a civil engineer can do. Or manage any project.

[–] LaMouette@jlai.lu 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Not it can't replace a civil engineer. Gen AI is very bad at math and reasoning. There is a study from Apple about this topic.

Then it won't be able to replace me either

[–] Zementid@feddit.nl 4 points 6 days ago

Well before that level of complexity is achieved, the jobs of CEOs and Managers will be gone. Question is, will the Ai CEO really want to risk the safety of a review, knowing that it IS the company. Pump and Dump won't do it any more. Then CEOs need to actually work for their money. (Or well... get replaced by an Ai)

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Once AI can develop code it can be used to improve itself in a feedback loop that would take short time to reach skynet.

We'd be the last of our species once it would want more resources than we'd be able to give it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ShadowRam@fedia.io 2 points 6 days ago

Who tells the AI what to create? And how well does the AI understand the exact thing the person is attempting to do?

It would be no different than prompt engineers now knowing exactly what the say/type in order to get the image output they want.

That prompt work would be a kind of programming code in upon itself.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'll take what money I have stashed away and buy a nice secluded parcel of property with dummy low taxes away from people.

I'll grow my own food, hunt, forage, etc.

I'll do odd jobs to fill in the gaps when needed. anything from tech consulting to roof repairs.

I'll refuse to use any technology unless a job requires it.

and I'll wait for the inevitable collapse of technological society because a vulnerability was baked into the AI every company is using and nobody knows how to fix it.

I refuse to be a part of a system that denies me a seat at the table.

[–] maniii@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago

Combine harvesters are used to till, plow , sow seed , spray, water, reap and manage farms and most livestock have dedicated automated farming tools like cow milkers, feeders, shearers, etc. How long before no humans needed to hunt or forage or farm? When food is even cheaper to produce( of course the ai overlords and ai royalty ) but will hunger games everyone to get the artificially shortage and scarcity farm for vast amounts of resources to select groups.

[–] deathmetal27@lemmy.world 78 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You seem like someone who hasn't really worked in software development.

Software engineering does not simply mean coding. A production grade software application goes through analysis, design, implementation (where coding happens), testing (several phases), release and maintenance. Not to mention infrastructure concerns (storage, databases, microservices, service orchestration, middleware, etc). The whole process is too nuanced and complex to conclude that AI would make the whole career obsolete. It might shake up some areas of software engineering but only a small part of it.

You'll still need people to verify that the AI generated application actually behaves as per the business logic, runs optimally with the hardware you have and scales as your business grows. Which means engineers for testing and reviewing the generated code plus engineers to setup the infrastructure where the application will run.

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 1 points 5 days ago

engineers for testing and reviewing the generated code plus engineers to setup the infrastructure where the application will run.

That's still a lot of software engineers displaced in the hypothetical scenario. That means you only need the devops and qa engineers, and a solution architect or principal engineer or whatever your company calls that sort of role for the analysis and design part.

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com 49 points 1 week ago (11 children)

That will never happen, or at least with how ai currently works. It's basically a glorified autocorrect, it uses the same technology underneath.

But presuming it does, yes. We will have to go to another industry, like AI prompting. Coding is a tiny part of professional software development.

[–] Enoril@jlai.lu 4 points 6 days ago

Glorified autocorrect... YES! It’s a really good analogy that i will use to temper the expectation of my boss. Also: AI hallucination is just a fancy way to say ’it’s a wrong answer’.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago

And if it's going to be full-blown AGI then we'll become AI psychologists.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The plan is to rehire them back temporarily to babysit the AI and fix all the AI generated crap. Then realize it was cheaper to actually just have the devs make code. Then hire them back at a reduced rate on a more permanent basis with the understanding that they believe the code will still be partially generated by AI and cleaned up by the same people and they aren't paying top tier for third hand AI slop.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They've been doing the same thing in IT for decades, just replace AI with outsourcing.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Same in a lot of other industries too. This is literally how capitalism functions. This is how they reduce costs when they can't find any other way.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 5 points 6 days ago

Except it is often more costly to do this in the long run, so it's a fiscally stupid move that corporations seem to make over and over again.

I think part of what perpetuates it is, the people making the decisions don't stay there long term, so they never really face the repercussions.

Some more stable places seem like they may have realized this though and keep things all or mostly in house.

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

Well if it can replace senior software engineers... Wouldn't it also be able to do almost all of the other jobs? Or are you referring to some specific future where AI advances massively, but robotics does not and handymen are still safe?

I'd say if all humans are unemployed, society would change massively. We can't really tell how that'd work. But if machines / AI do all jobs, get food on the table... I don't really know what other people would be doing. I think I'd relax and pursue a few hobbies and interests. Or it'd be some dystopia where humankind is oppressed by the machines and I'd fight for the resistance.

But regardless... In a world like that, money wouldn't work the way it does now. Neither would salaries for labor mean anything.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Anissem@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago

I was going to learn how to give a really good handjob but the AI robots will probably take over that too.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Welcome to being a luddite.

It's not actually about hating the progression of technology, it's realizing that your labor has been leveraged against you. You will not bear any of the true fruits, because your bosses will use the fruits of your labor to purchase the AI to replace you.

It's because the labor market is fucked and developers needed unions 20 years ago instead of thinking because they were "rockstars" and "made the big bucks" that they didn't need anybody else.

We wouldn't have to ask these kind of questions if the fruits of our labor were being equitably distributed.

Basically in the scenario described, this is what's happening to developers:

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

Capitalism is an auto-immune disease of society.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hellothere@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Homemade pornography, obviously.

But actually, I'll limit myself to fixing deployment pipelines, correcting business specification mistakes, helping business leaders understand how computers work at all, mitigating moderate security issues, and finding a new job when the unmitigated severe security issues drive my employer bankrupt.

So essentially, exactly how I spend my day today, but with less typing.

And more nude photography, of course.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 6 points 1 week ago

Ultimately we need to prepare for a future where the majority of jobs have been automated and need a way to keep the economy going. Everyone being employed full time is just something that is not sustainable on the long term as technology progresses. We'll eventually need UBI because otherwise all the money will be transferred to nearly fully automated companies controlling basically everything. We just won't be able to keep everyone employed without creating a massive amount of bullshit jobs nobody really wants to do. The better way is UBI and people going into research or creative works, and aim higher like space travel.

We're not quite ready yet and people are way too invested in capitalism for this to work just yet. But it will become a necessity eventually. It's not just affecting IT, it's affecting all sectors: we can basically 3D print houses now, we're not far off automating farming either. We will reach a point where most of society has been automated, we can feed everyone effortlessly.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They'll get jobs as contractors fixing shitty AI code

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bedlam@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's something that we're probably going to have to figure out quickly. We won't though given the lack of accountability of those in power.

If SWEs are losing their jobs you can imagine a lot of other white collar workers will be as well. This would mean you will be competing with many other people in other fields. The large number of unemployed will reduce demand for goods produced by those companies that are also laying off workers due to automation.

This is a bit of a tragedy of the commons where companies adopt the technology to increase profits but actually disrupt the economy, potentially leading to their own collapse.

It's impossible to really prepare for this scenario because it requires you to simultaneously be ready for retirement in the next few years but also riots. I'm just hoping for the best for now.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago

We won’t though given the lack of accountability of those in power.

That is not an inevitable condition.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 3 points 1 week ago

Plan? The CEOs plan to buy another yacht. These people are only interested in short term profits, not the long term well-being of their employees.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›