this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
457 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

60560 readers
3501 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 112 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (25 children)

~~LGBTQ+~~ Everyone, but LGBTQ+ people especially need to get the the fuck off of Meta services now, they've showed what side they're on.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 52 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Straight+cis people too. I'm downloading an export of my Facebook info as we speak in preparation for closing it down.

I just deleted my old, disused Instagram account I hadn't touched in a long long time. Nothing even worth saving since I never uploaded anything to it. It was the only Meta account I still had around.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 63 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I guess advertisers have no issues with Meta’s changes. Interesting. A few years ago, they’d be falling over themselves to signal that “hate has no place here”. But it is no longer profitable to be LGBTQ+ so let the hateful bell ring.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Eh. The advertisers will be back to supporting LGBTQ whenever that month of year comes back

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 1 week ago

This year? Doubt.

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (13 children)

I wonder why nobody is considering the most obvious solution to all this complication around what is NSFW and what is not: Children shouldn't be on these platforms at all to begin with. They shouldn't be anywhere near social media until age 14. Definitely not free roaming everywhere on the internet.

For us adults, I honestly cannot say whether moderation instigated by a company is better than moderation instigated by the users. The devil is in the details. This place isn't moderated by a company and you'd probably think the moderation here is superior to Meta's.

[–] anindefinitearticle@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I disagree with this point.

I used the internet extensively as a minor to socialize and find friends and to be exposed to viewpoints different from those of my peers. If I only had my peers to socialize with, things would have been much worse off for me. I found kind and supportive influences as a minor that kept me away from the hate/conservatism/fascism that many of my classmates descended into. I learned about the world and gained skills that made me a more well-rounded person. I even met up in person with thousands of strangers and had a grand time.

I see the gatekeeping of minors from internet spaces and worry about the impact that would have had on me and my development as a young person. If I hadn't been welcomed as a minor online, I would not have been welcomed anywhere.

That said, I stayed the hell away from corporate spyware like facebook and twitter that only serve to reinforce existing problematic systems, expose people to the toxic IRL social environments that they may otherwise be trying to escape, and amplify the kind of hatred and bigotry that I personally was evading.

I miss the old internet where kids were safe. I don't think that the solution is to ban kids; the solution is to ban platforms and profiteering incentive structures that create unsafe environments. The kids are the canaries in a coal mine. If the canary isn't doing well, you don't just ban it and keep digging: you get the hell out and find somewhere else to be.

[–] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I understand this sentiment because I had a similar story growing up, but I've had to come to terms that the internet of that era does not exist anymore.

Now we have these corporations who made it their goal to algorithmically trick you into spending more and more time engaged with their website for ad revenue, not caring how angry or misinformed people get in the meantime. It used to be a place we could escape to, but has turned into just another echo chamber/prison and worst of all - we're addicted to it.

I think places like Mastodon and the Fediverse can help bridge this gap, but on the whole, the internet is just not a safe place for developing brains anymore.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 week ago

I'm with you on this. My childhood church was christo-fascist, and it was my wide wanderings on the web that showed me a different way was possible.

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I found kind and supportive influences as a minor that kept me away from the hate/conservatism/fascism that many of my classmates descended into.

Do you think your classmates found those influences from somewhere outside the internet? At least in Europe, the alt-right has been way more efficient at reaching young people online, especially boys and men.

I'm also talking about 15-20 years ago.

The influences I had were furries (queers), science/scifi nerds, academics, service members of the military who were otherwise separated from community, etc. The internet brought us together.

It was that or rural Florida where if you went outside and got stabbed by one of those poison palm you'd just get told that those have to be there because they kept the slaves from escaping the circus in the good old days.

What you're talking about with kids today is what I mean about them being canaries.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] roawn@feddit.uk 34 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Posts with LGBTQ+ hashtags including #lesbian, #bisexual, #gay, #trans, #queer, #nonbinary, #pansexial, #transwomen, #Tgirl, #Tboy, #Tgirlsarebeautiful, #bisexualpride, #lesbianpride, and dozens of others were hidden for any users who had their sensitive content filter turned on. Teenagers have the sensitive content filter turned on by default.

Kids wont even know what they will lose with his representation going missing on Instagram. So depressing. Wish that lizard freak the worst.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Never used Facebook, never fucking will.

[–] PlantJam@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I haven't in over a decade. I think I'm up to eight different word filters trying to stop news stories about this from showing up on my feed. If they didn't have such a stupid name I could just block the term meta.

Plot twist: that was their plan all along.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What about WhatsApp?

What about Instagram?

Also does your Lemmy instance federate with Threads?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Friendly reminder: Deleting your account won't accomplish what you think it will.

Facebook will still keep all data that is associated with other users as per their own disclaimer. They also still keep logs that are "disassociated with personal identifiers. "

So all training can still occur. And understand what while Jane Smith may have deleted her account, they still have all the data it takes to indicate that User 12345 was tagged in photos with John Smith at the Burger King on 404 Fake St. And, because of that, the data that User 12345 had previously provided is ALSO John Smith's data. And Fred Wilkerson since he was at that Burger King once. And so forth.

And ALL that data is still there for training.

So do what you gotta do to make it less appealing to other users. But understand your data is already out there and is never going away. Same with reddit and all other social media (which includes Lemmy).

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah but you know what? That's still better than actively engaging with their "services".

Eventually, it'll just be bots interacting with themselves, given enough time.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Eventually, it'll just be bots interacting with themselves, given enough time.

It seems like that's a good chunk of it already

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

Yes. Like I said. Do what you gotta do to make it less appealing to other users.

But if, for example, you are an LGBTQIA+ person who thinks this will provide any form of protection...

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If you're in the US, sure. If you're in Europe you can compel them to completely delete everything as per the GDPR.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 week ago (5 children)

And I am sure a company that is now openly training their LLMs on copyrighted materials is going to totally comply with all of that...

One of these days people are going to learn "But it is against the law" doesn't apply to the rich and powerful, law enforcement, or megacorporations.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] AwakenedAce@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago

No, I tried, they don't comply, and tell you to make a complaint to your DPA and the Irish DPA or go to court if you have a problem with that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wait, Pro-LGBT speech IS NOT allowed!?!?! Holy fucking shit, this isn't a cesspool, it's an execution by firing squad.

[–] airportline@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

That's a misreading of the headline. Pro-LGBT speech IS allowed, but often suppressed.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

I was in admin chat on facebook and it was blocking any posts with links to https://lemmy.world/. I was talking to admins about firing up a lemmy instance and leave the FB group as a link to a lemmy community

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm kinda shocked people still actively use Facebook.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Only ~3,000,000,000 people/month.

[–] WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I would take the 3 B number with a pinch of salt. Its 3 B accounts, not unique individuals.

At one point last decade I had 11 seperate Facebook accounts, used for various purposes. They're all deleted now, but my behaviour is not unique. There will be many, many people running multiple accounts, and don't forget bots

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›