this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2025
693 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

61227 readers
6184 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AidsKitty@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It's freedom of speech. Being able to say what you want and suffer the consequences of your decisions is what it is all about.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I think the big reason they are allowing it is because they got to cut the entire cost of having moderation with an external vendor. Not because they have an agenda or anything. Its pure dollars.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

On the bright side, if there's a boomer who only posts bad memes about how much he hates his wife, you can say he has a mental illness.

You could before, because it's true, but you still can too.

[–] b1tstremist0@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago

So what I see is, Meta first creates the problem of trans-metaverse by super aggressive inorganic promotion and then makes it even worse by cutting the expenses on such useless promotion. XD

L for all those who fell for it. Society eats you up (not sexually, keep your pants on) for getting mentally manipulated so easily.

[–] GoMati@lemmy.world -3 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Looking at what's already been said I will most probably get down voted, but it should only back my words up.

People should be able to write everything they want on the internet. And I should have the right to totally ignore everything they say. So why should I become a snowflake and care about other people's opinion or think a big corporation will moderate somebody out of their platform? 🤔

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Because if you don't care they get offended.

The irony is that these platforms never did bother to moderate. I'll occasionally flag some comments that are very obvious hate speech and the response is always "we found nothing wrong".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world -3 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

If you don't let them speak up, how are we going to find the racists? They're all old so it's not like they just suddenly appeared when Obama was elected. They've been hiding and hidden. Bring the assholes into the light, and let's get out the dildo of consequence.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] john89@lemmy.ca -5 points 3 weeks ago (13 children)

This is a good thing.

Let people say what they want. If you don't like it, you can always ignore them.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] DegenerateSupreme@lemmy.zip -5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I feel conflicted. On one hand, people can regulate themselves, and Facebook becoming a bigoted cesspit may bring more people to a moderated Fediverse.

On the other hand, these major platforms having such user monopoly and influence can cause unfettered hate speech to breed violence.

I’m conflicted about the idea that an insidious for-profit megacorporation should be expected to uphold a moral responsibility to prevent violence; their failure to do so might be a necessary wake-up call that ultimately strips them of that problematic influence. Thoughts?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›