this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45745 readers
97 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (10 children)

There are clips out there of FOX news saying "if global warning is real, then why is there a blizzard?!"

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've already had people demand "source?" for the most mundane facts. Why yes steroids do enhance physical ability.

[–] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] residentmarchant@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Read the comment above yours, that's where I learned about it

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

this guy showed up with receipts

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nyanix@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

ngl, I don't comment nearly as often anymore out of concern for anything I say to be misconstrued, argued, or wanting verification like this meme. Ya'll, I've got a job and a life, I can't/don't want to sit here and fight people. The worst gets assumed of anything and it gets difficult to have productive, much less positive discourse online.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

This is also due to a distinct drop in reader comprehension. One of the largest parts of reading comprehension is being able to infer the intended audience for a particular piece of work. You should be able to read a news article, see a commercial, read a comment, etc and infer who it is aimed at. And the answer is usually not “me”.

People have become accustomed to having an algorithm that is laser focused to their specific preferences. So when they see something that’s not aimed at them it is jarring, and they tend to get upset. Instead of going “oh this clearly isn’t aimed at me, but I can infer who the intended audience is. I’ll move on.” Now they tend to jump on the creator with whataboutisms and imagined offense.

Maybe you make a post about the proper way to throw a football. You’ll inevitably get a few “bUT wHaT abOUt WhEElcHaiR uSerS, I hAvE a baD ShoUlDer aNd cAn’T thROW SO wHaT abOUt me, I haTE FoOtbAll wHY aRe yOU SHowiNG tHIs to Me, etc” types of comments. It’s because those users have lost the ability to infer an intended audience. They automatically assume everything they see is aimed at them, and get offended when it isn’t.

I have even noticed this started to affect the way media is written. Creators tend to make it a point to outright state their intended audience, just to avoid the negative comments.

[–] Maeve@midwest.social 0 points 1 month ago

"If it doesn't apply, let it fly." "Hit dogs holler."

[–] ilhamagh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Hmm good point. Never realized there could be connection with hyper curated algorithm and main character syndrome.

Now I kinda understand why "just look away" makes no sense to these kinda people.

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

This is a very interesting idea. It would certainly explain why people seem to constantly "infill" everything everone says with whatever gets them the most angry - the algo feeds them ragebait, so that's what they see.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Darkenfolk@dormi.zone 0 points 1 month ago

What, feeling too good for an unproductive Internet fight with strangers who probably would agree with you if they could read?

[–] root_beer@midwest.social 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Hidden panel: guy on left saying “google it yourself, don’t expect me to have to teach you anything”

Why should anyone ever have to substantiate their claims???

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I would just assume that anyone who needed a cite for really obvious stuff is just trolling.

[–] root_beer@midwest.social 0 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I suppose the obvious stuff, sure

Guess I’m just rankled by seeing so many people making baseless claims and then telling everyone to figure it out themselves when they get called out on it, and it’s not the same as this.

[–] Toribor@corndog.social 0 points 1 month ago

I asked my employer provided AI assistant if this is true and it assured me that natural snowfall was disinformation invented by leftists in order to destroy our capitalist utopia.

[–] CazzoneArrapante@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Just give me back the fucking 80s and 90s.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 0 points 1 month ago

I would like to see the source for this meme.

[–] Shark_Ra_Thanos@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Don't worry. It won't happen like this. There will be no one left.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

SOURc......

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 month ago

We lost all the ice in the polar regions back in 2013. And the hole in the ozone layer killed everyone back in the 1990s

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›