this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
269 points (95.6% liked)

World News

38750 readers
2815 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Over the past 10 years, rates of colorectal cancer among 25 to 49 year olds have increased in 24 different countries, including the UK, US, France, Australia, Canada, Norway and Argentina.

The investigation's early findings, presented by an international team at the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) congress in Geneva in September 2024, were as eye-catching as they are concerning.

The researchers, from the American Cancer Society (ACS) and the World Health Organization's (WHO's) International Agency for Research on Cancer, surveyed data from 50 countries to understand the trend. In 14 of these countries, the rising trend was only seen in younger adults, with older adult rates remaining stable.

Based on epidemiological investigations, it seems that this trend first began in the 1990s. One study found that the global incidence of early-onset cancer had increased by 79% between 1990 and 2019, with the number of cancer-related deaths in younger people rising by 29%. Another report in The Lancet Public Health described how cancer incidence rates in the US have steadily risen between the generations across 17 different cancers, particularly in Generation Xers and Millennials.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Could it be the single use micro plastics….

Older people have cancer and a lot of doctors just call it aging. That’s how common it is. It’s normalized. Now that the younger are catching up they are suddenly concerned that this is a problem.

[–] BigBrainBrett2517@lemmy.world -2 points 5 hours ago

👉👌/🤌👌

[–] LouNeko@lemmy.world 24 points 19 hours ago

The diffrence is "living in an ecological system" and "living in an economic system".

[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 17 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

There's so many factors. Pesticides, nitrates are prevalent in most meat products, lack of dietary fibre can increase risks of colon cancer and high cholesterol.

Not to mention micro plastics (though they've been around for longer than we've known I bet) and forever chemicals like PFAs (though not sure if they're cancerous??).

[–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Don't forget light pollution.

[–] BobGnarley@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago

Nope, still a puzzle says the business owner. We just have no idea what could be doing this.

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago

Obesity tracks with this. Maybe not the direct cause, there might be some underlying cause for both, but excess fat absolutely does increase your risk of cancer. I'm pretty sure being big in any way does - if there is more of you, more cells, more chance of mutation.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Recently I went to Seattle's children's museum and when it was about to close I found my self staring at the cosmic particle fog tank. It's a tank that has low temperature evaporated alcohol in it which creates wisps of fog if highly energetic particles pass thru it. Well I didn't know what it was until I started noticing the wisps and remembering a YouTube video in the device. It was like a wisp every 10 seconds. Suddenly this family passed by and the little 3 or 4 year old kid approaches the box to see what was in it. The thing lit up like a freaking Christmas tree. Like 10 wisps per second as soon as the kid put his hands on the side of the glass. I looked at him thinking, you don't know, just live out your life in happiness kid.

[–] Cornpop@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That’s wild. Wonder why child was extra radioactive

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was totally bewildered. I should have run to the parents to show them. It was just crazy. Maybe they gave him a hammer and a bunch of smoke detectors the day before.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

possibly leukemia and what you were seeing is the effects of treatment...

fuck all cancer.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh yeah, what if he had cancer treatment recently! That could have been? Or tracer fluid for MRI.

[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

would be an injectable radiation therapy or a radiotracer for a PET or SPECT scan. afaik radioactive tracers aren't used in MRI or regular CT scanning

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

A radioactive tracer can be used in a PET/MRI scan, or a gadolinium-based contrast medium used in an MRI scan. But I think you're right about MRI not actually requiring a tracer.

load more comments
view more: next ›