this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
43 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59672 readers
2851 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Trump sues mirror for making him look ugly.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Giuliani is still confused why Trump likes looking into the shiny blank glass. Also why garlic makes him bleed

[–] towerful@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh, I thought it was hair die that was dripping down his face.
Make sense it was ichor leaking from somewhere

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

4 seasons landscaping was consecrated ground!

[–] xlash123@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What is even the grounds for this? You can't call election interference on a private company because of a preference for a candidate. That's like if Harris wanted to sue Fox News for a bias towards Trump. Private companies are allowed to have biases.

It is also completely possible that the supposed preferential treatment may be due to public opinion and news reporting. Kinda like how if you lie a lot, people call you out on it, but that doesn't make it illegal that they don't call out your opponent equally as much.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

For a company that is a monopoly - you should logically be able to, monopolies are not allowed to have biases (shouldn't exist in the first place though).

For a company that says it's a search engine but in fact meddles with recommendations - you should logically be able to, they are calling themselves not what they are in fact.

Both would mean putting all the big tech top management into jail, though. So no chance.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 1 month ago

Not exactly, that would work quite differently if Fox had a news monopoly.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Oh, he cannot afford SEO or placing paid ads anymore? Is he fianlly broke by all thoe costs for lawyers and lawsuits?

[–] Brown5500@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago

Tell me you don't understand the bill of rights without mentioning the constitution

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Awww is the internet being mean to you again, ya weirdo?

Lots of reasons to dislike Google. That is not one of them.

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

The first part of that title had me thinking "Did he actually say something intelligent?" then I read the rest

[–] YourAvgMortal@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I’m all in favour of prosecuting Google for it’s search monopoly, but Trump only cares about using the monopoly in his own favour

[–] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

yep, he will only do something if he thinks it will benefit himself. It's who he is.

[–] hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago

Dude's always been crazy. Nothing to see here.

[–] ohellidk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I hate google too, but for vastly different reasons.

[–] YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

"We are not the same" I think is what you meant to say