this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
1 points (66.7% liked)

Technology

59672 readers
2763 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Snapchat is reserving the right to put its users’ faces in ads, according to terms of service related to its “My Selfie” tool (formerly “AI Selfies”), which allows users and their friends to create AI-generated images trained on their selfies.

Users have the option to opt out of this by toggling off a “feature” in the app called “See My Selfie in Ads,” but according to 404 Media’s testing this feature is on by default.

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rob200@lemmy.autism.place 0 points 2 months ago

No. Just no. Not even going to highlight anything from this article.

[–] vikingtons@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sadly it’s not responding at the moment. At least for me.

[–] vikingtons@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Ah yeah, I'm not getting any response from https://archive.ph/ right now :/

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Snapchat hereby has the right to suck my ass.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Ur gonna regret that harder than the poor souls making up the HumanCentiPad

[–] Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Snapchat the next Day:

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

*Snapchat reserves the right to use your ass in AI ads

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I can't think of a way for this to be legal in the EU by any capacity. I really don't. They're essentially claiming they own your likeness just by using their app and I really doubt it's that simple. It's kind of like asking for your first born in a readme.txt of a github script. Just because you write something ridiculous doesn't mean it's legal.

[–] RustyShackleford@literature.cafe 0 points 2 months ago

No, but they’ll try because the citizens aren’t rebelling against it yet.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

they know that the type of people who use snapchat of all fucking things either don't give a shit, or are too ignorant to see it as an issue. if they ever read about this at all. at the end of the day, they know that not enough people will ditch the platform to make any difference

[–] Orbituary@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I'd say the same for Tiktok users. But that's the popular platform, so it's unpopular to criticize it.

[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

I really did think that a Chinese social media company would never stand a chance here. I run into 80 year old farmers who ask me, “Did you see ‘at feller on TikTok who does ‘at thang with the tractor?”

That same person will go on and on about China. People are neat.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago

For anyone that has friends that can be convinced to move off snapchat:

  • it doesn't actually delete things after the timer goes out, it just hides it from view. Sometimes the app bugs out and that data will be accessible again
  • signal has stories and the same format of disappearing messages
  • everything else that's good about signal

If what they want is the "One weird trick your doctor is hiding from you" style content on the discover page, then I got nothing.

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If you don't use that feature, it's a non issue. Right?

[–] nieminen@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's the principle of the thing. These companies keep overreaching all the time.

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Yeah. I suppose. It would have been better from a security/privacy standpoint for it to be an opt-in vs an opt-out.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

If they would have had two working brain cells they would have made it opt in and made a contest told them that one lucky person will win $10,000.

[–] shani66@ani.social 0 points 2 months ago

Or to not do it to begin with.

[–] nieminen@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

That's the thing though. They know nobody would ever do this voluntarily.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Name checks out...

[–] warm@kbin.earth 0 points 2 months ago

Doesn't seem to exist at all in EU. Disgusting either way.

[–] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I mean, this is dumb, but it's only ads specifically shown to you so it isn't really a privacy issue. The headline seems like it's intentionally trying to make it seem a lot worse than it is

[–] simonced@lemmy.one 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It's still not a feature that users asked for. Hence why making it in the first place, is hiding some darker and creepier objectives.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago

If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said ~~“faster horses.“~~ surveillance capitalism.

[–] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean yeah it's a stupid feature that they probably shouldn't have, I just think the headline is super misleading since it implies they would use your face to advertise to to others which isn't true.

[–] simonced@lemmy.one 0 points 2 months ago

The fact they think I want to see my face in ads, is dumb beyond belief. And they spent money on that lol.

[–] TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I don't why you are so downvoted. Your comment didn't come off as shilling for Snapchat or anything, and it just clarifies things for people who only read the headline. I appreciate the clarification.

This is still an invasion of privacy, but not quite as egregious as using people's faces in global advertisements. Obligatory fuck Snapchat, regardless.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago
[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think i still have an account of it, but I haven't agreed to anything, so I should be good, right...? Anyone know?

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You think that will stop them? They'll just do it and pay a comparatively small fine to the government in a decade after they get around to investigating it. And that's the best case scenario. More realistically nothing will ever happen.

[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah i fear that... i should probably just delete my account

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

That won't stop them either. They'll just use it anyway. These companies never delete anything they might be able to use. At least not willingly.

[–] jewbacca117@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

What I'm gathering, it's just the my selfie tool right? I've never bothered to set that up anyways

[–] Louisoix@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago

LoL good luck with my fucked up face!

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's why I deleted my account. May Snapchat rest in piss.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

I cannot, I have had it for over a decade at this rate I think and my number associated is old now and I can't log into to the website to delete. I can log into the app and use it but cannot delete it.

[–] darkmogool@feddit.org 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Wait… Snapchat still exists?

[–] sverit@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 0 points 2 months ago

Oh no! Another thing I don't use turning out to be shitty.