this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
4 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59651 readers
2690 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

You might sideload an Android app, or manually install its APK package, if you're using a custom version of Android that doesn't include Google's Play Store. Alternately, the app might be experimental, under development, or perhaps no longer maintained and offered by its developer. Until now, the existence of sideload-ready APKs on the web was something that seemed to be tolerated, if warned against, by Google.

This quiet standstill is being shaken up by a new feature in Google's Play Integrity API. As reported by Android Authority, developer tools to push "remediation" dialogs during sideloading debuted at Google's I/O conference in May, have begun showing up on users' phones. Sideloaders of apps from the British shop Tesco, fandom app BeyBlade X, and ChatGPT have reported "Get this app from Play" prompts, which cannot be worked around. An Android gaming handheld user encountered a similarly worded prompt from Diablo Immortal on their device three months ago.

Google's Play Integrity API is how apps have previously blocked access when loaded onto phones that are in some way modified from a stock OS with all Google Play integrations intact. Recently, a popular two-factor authentication app blocked access on rooted phones, including the security-minded GrapheneOS. Apps can call the Play Integrity API and get back an "integrity verdict," relaying if the phone has a "trustworthy" software environment, has Google Play Protect enabled, and passes other software checks.

Graphene has questioned the veracity of Google's Integrity API and SafetyNet Attestation systems, recommending instead standard Android hardware attestation. Rahman notes that apps do not have to take an all-or-nothing approach to integrity checking. Rather than block installation entirely, apps could call on the API only during sensitive actions, issuing a warning there. But not having a Play Store connection can also deprive developers of metrics, allow for installation on incompatible devices (and resulting bad reviews), and, of course, open the door to paid app piracy.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eleitl@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (13 children)

I get most of my stuff via F-Droid or I could use Obtainium. My tablet is Google-free. This sounds like my phone should be Google-free as well.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Lucky Patcher?

[–] mitrosus@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 months ago

Long live custom degoogled ROM.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Was always inching closer, but looks like android has fully outstayed its welcome. The revolving door of executives hit its last person with any integrity on the ass on their way out the door.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

yup they are tightening their grip again

[–] sjpwarren@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] ARandomPerson@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago

Waging war against ad blockers and third party clients and now this it seems?

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Amazing that they can't seem to see that they are not going to win any customers by trying to out Apple Apple.

[–] Unboxious@ani.social 0 points 2 months ago

I use apps that aren't available in my region for language study, so this could end up being a real problem for me.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 0 points 2 months ago

OK I'm not going crazy then.

[–] DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Haha, gross: We can't control the devices we own.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] darth_tiktaalik@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Google and Apple have come out against legislation that would broaden sideloading rights for smartphone owners, citing security and reliability concerns.

Fuck off google.

[–] hogmomma@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

...as I upvote you from my Pixel. ☹️ I give the sad face because Google isn't who they once were and I'm just going to have to deal with that.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›