this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59672 readers
2908 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Naturally the price for the cheapest model will also be going to up several orders of magnitude more than the cost of materials, labor, and healthy profit margin to account for that as well I'm sure.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

In 1999, the iBook was US$1599 (equivalent to $2925 in 2023) (source).

The 2010 13" Air was $1299 (more in today's $) (source).

The current 13" M3 Air is $1099 (source).

So yeah, they may well raise prices, but the cost of Apple's entry-level hardware has decreased in absolute terms over the years, and has decreased substantially if inflation is taken into account. Not to say the margins aren't higher (no idea about that), but it's interesting.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago

Yeah it's when you need a reasonable amount of RAM or disk that they really bend you over.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Has anyone ever successfully de-soldered Apple RAM and replaced it?

[–] chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net 0 points 3 months ago

Pretty sure it is baked in as part of the SOC, not soldered on after the fact?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 0 points 3 months ago

I think it's proprietary ram as well so you can't just get something off the market and solder it on. It has to be their ram or it won't work.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Isn't the RAM inside the actual SoC with the Apple Silicon line? I haven't really opened any of 'em up.

As for older Macs - sure, I know someone who replaced 8 gigs with 16 on either an Air or Pro model that had 16 available as an option but was shipped with 8. It's just something you do when you have way too many Mac boards lying around at work and your bosses say you can't get a new work laptop.

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

dosdude on YouTube I think has done this

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

and maximum since you probably won't be able to upgrade it since silicon doesn't allow upgrades

[–] stellargmite@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (9 children)

Yeh can upgrade them at purchase. From 256gb storage to 512gb will only cost you one kidney.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 0 points 3 months ago (9 children)

I always thought 8gb was a fine amount for daily use if you never did anything too heavy, are apps really that ram intense now?

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Imagine how far you can go on 8GB of RAM if every piece of software were still well optimized and free of bloat.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Recently I downloaded Chrome for some testing that I wanted to let separate from my Firefox browser. After a while I realized my computer was always getting hot every time I opened chrome. I took a look at the system monitor: chrome was using 30% of of my CPU power to play a single YouTube video in the background. What the fuck? I ended up switching the testing environment over the libreWolf and CPU load went down to only 10%.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›