this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
1384 points (98.9% liked)

Science Memes

11217 readers
2960 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wren@feddit.uk 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I've only ever published in open access journals (partially because I've only got 3 papers out, but also out of preference) is it just prestige that makes people go with pay-to-view journals? or are there other factors?

[–] adenoid@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

In part it's prestige, which for some might matter for promotion purposes, and at least personally I'm more like to cite journals for which I know I trust their judgement in peer review and submission acceptance. There are predatory publishers which abuse the open access concept to make money, and if I'm reviewing literature I don't want to have to also research if a journal can be trusted (unless of course the publication I want to include is novel or especially worthwhile).

Also, in many contexts open access requires payment by the authors; this may be fine if an author is in a large grant-funded lab or at an institution willing to fund the open access fee but for many of us non-research-track folks it's kind of a deal breaker.

[–] mineralfellow@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Depends strongly on the community. Every sub discipline has its own standards of respectability. Publishing outside of those constraints can cause articles to be ignored.

[–] wren@feddit.uk 2 points 3 months ago

that makes a lot of sense! I'm very grateful to be part of an academic community that seems to value open access, as well of part of a university that pays for access and submission to most of the journals I need to use

[–] Unboxious@ani.social 7 points 3 months ago

Okay, but what are the profits? That's what actually matters here.

[–] mumblerfish@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

I did get paid for reviewing for a Springer journal though. Next to nothing, but it's not zero.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

That's money better spent on shutting down libraries.

[–] D61@hexbear.net 2 points 3 months ago

Before Roblox there was this...

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›