this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
590 points (97.9% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35552 readers
1205 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit:

The poll stopped me in my tracks but it's actually even worse.

It should not take this long to get to imdb

Edit2: didn't even realize it thinks I'll "love it" based on things I look up. I don't think I'd like it.

Edit³: IMDb was the example I used without thinking. I'm aware that there's a link to it in the top card. It's the other web results that I don't already know about that I'd like to see. I now know there's a hidden "web" tab. There's also https://www.google.com/search?udm=14&q=example` but it's still mildly infuriating that you have to know about these things to get the basic results we expected for years.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 115 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Damn. I switched to DDG like well over a year ago and thought I was just kind of putting up with it for the sake of privacy. Turns out I didn't know how good I have it

[–] fritobugger2017@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Exactly. I've been using DDG for years now and when I have to use Google search for whatever reason, I am quickly reminded how crap ggl is.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] hungprocess@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It shouldn't take this long to get to imdb

In case anyone here isn't aware, you can directly search IMDB from DuckDuckGo by using the bang !imdb.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cheddar@programming.dev 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

DDG is moving into the same direction. I had to use ublock to hide the news block that appears when I'm searching for a movie/show in order to avoid spoilers.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

In fact this was one of the key features lauded about DDG in its early days, the "instant result"-boxes.

Google kinda only went hard on them afterwards, probably seeing a good idea over at DDG because for the vast majority of people, they're looking for answers and results, not specifically objects of type link-to-search-result. They don't need a list of links, so long as the information they were after is reliably in those generated cards.

See OP wanting an IMDB link, which is directly there as Google correctly assumed that's a very very very common use case for googling the name of a movie.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 71 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We had no idea how good we had it back then, did we?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] novettam@lemmy.blahaj.zone 59 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A poll in the search results, what the heck?!

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 54 points 3 months ago (4 children)

They're throwing shit at the wall I guess. Last week I got this in my YouTube feed:

[–] LostXOR@fedia.io 34 points 3 months ago

Great, now they're going to start giving us exams before we're allowed to watch a video.

[–] Jilanico@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Are they trying to train an AI?

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I doubt it. They know I'm into audio production and this is kind of a softball question. Maybe if they start giving me more advanced ones.

[–] Jilanico@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The Gemini logo next to the word "Experiment" makes me suspicious.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 months ago

The quiz itself was definitely made by an AI.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 56 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Here's duckduckgo result for comparison

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 29 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Here's AskJeeves result for comparison

[–] Schmuppes@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 9 points 3 months ago

Yeah I have no idea what any if that is! I miss Jeeves :(

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

Wow, that's incredibly bad.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 months ago

Damn, I knew Jeeves had fallen but this is actually baffling.

[–] BitsOfBeard@programming.dev 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Here is Kagi. It is customizable, so it will look different for everyone.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] felbane@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago (3 children)
[–] can@sh.itjust.works 22 points 3 months ago

This is the impetus I needed

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 18 points 3 months ago

1 is the right number of info cards

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

Your daily reminder that DDG also has an infinite scroll option under its settings. (Seriously, DDG's Settings menu is so good.}

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 29 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Did it spoil the movie in the suggested questions 💀

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 24 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I know this won't be the answer people want, but to be perfectly frank if I know I want the IMDb page for a movie, I put IMDb in the query. It will put the page you want right at the top, none of that extra shit, and it will even probably predict what you're typing before you finish.

[–] ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago (1 children)

separately, imdb itself has been enshittified enough that, most times, i don't want the imdb page as a search result.

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Anyone know good alternatives?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MrMobius@sh.itjust.works 22 points 3 months ago

Don't worry, Google is actually getting sued for its various malpractices (paying browsers millions to be their default search engine, Google adsense putting the best bidder at the top of the search results, etc). It might even come to the US justice system ordering the breakup of various Google products into smaller independent companies.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 21 points 3 months ago

It was too good and offered no financial incentive for them to continue with it. It's better if users scroll endlessly looking for the information that used to simply be available instantly.

[–] nogooduser@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago (3 children)

In fairness, IMDB is right there on the first info card.

[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (3 children)

As a side point: IMDB's page is even more obtuse and unnavigable than it was 5 years ago. Literally no hotbar...

Every front end design dev that graduated in the last decade is brain damaged

[–] nogooduser@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That’s Amazon’s way of working. They push the content that they want you to use over what you want to use.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ech@lemm.ee 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

If anyone still wants to use google without this, you can use this url, replacing '%s' with your search

https://www.google.com/search?q=%s&udm=14

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago (5 children)

To be fair. All the information for the movie is right there at the top. If you wanted just info about the movie.

The poll though... Ya... That's kinda crazy.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] NicoCharrua@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 months ago

Tbf there's a link to imdb on the first image

Yeah I usually like the Google boxes in search results, but this is so excessive. Everything after and including the polls is just completely unnecessary

[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I switched to DuckDuckGo on all my devices and I get shocked that people can’t find anything when they search.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Momentum's a bitch. I've been using google search since I lost touch with Jeeves and that pile of dogs ran away.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] th3dogcow@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It sucks, yes. But, if you select the “web” tab instead of the “all” tab at the top of the page, you’ll get something more akin to what you’re looking for. There’s probably even a way to script it so that it defaults to that view.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The tab that you have to scroll past shopping to know it even exists.

[–] th3dogcow@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Yep! So convenient /s

[–] HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Getting results without scrolling? That day is today.

https://kagi.com/

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Damn the second image in your post didn't load for me and it turned my Connect into an infinite grey screen

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I messed up the link twice in weird ways. It should be fixed now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] soulfirethewolf@lemdro.id 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The polls are completely idiotic but I personally find info cards to be quite helpful.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The info cards are a cancer on the internet. They exist only so you stay on Google's page and don't follow a link to another site.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bianca_0089@lemmy.today 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Seeing only (edit..) two to three // results per scroll is way too cramped.

I miss the early 2000s when you'd get like 15 or 20 search results a page on a 1280 monitor because hosts weren't BLIND.

load more comments
view more: next ›