this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59651 readers
2646 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

NY Post

Going to need a much better source than this.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Thanks.

Justice Department officials are considering what remedies to ask a federal judge to order against the search giant, said three people with knowledge of the deliberations involving the agency and state attorneys general who helped to bring the case. They are discussing various proposals, including breaking off parts of Google, such as its Chrome browser or Android smartphone operating system, two of the people said.

...

Last week’s ruling that Google was a monopolist was a landmark antitrust decision, raising serious questions about the power of tech giants in the modern internet era. Apple, Amazon and Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, also face antitrust cases. Google is scheduled to go to trial in another antitrust case — this one over ad technology — next month. Any remedies in Google’s search case are likely to reverberate and influence that broader landscape.

TIL, the ruling might actually carry some consequences. I guess we'll see where this takes us.

[–] ngwoo@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Big tech needs far stricter regulations but I don't think people would like the internet very much if Google was forced to sell off services like YouTube. Nobody else is offering unlimited free hosting, discoverability, promotion, and bandwidth for video content and nobody ever will again. If the chromium project was sold off to some other shitty tech company, do you really think they'd keep the open source 'ungoogled' version readily available for everyone? A Google breakup would just mean that other tech companies like Apple, Microsoft, Oracle, etc get more powerful.

If there's an appetite for breakups why not start with the companies that control our food and news

[–] person420@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 3 months ago

There's also how much of a pain that would be for the end user. Would I have to create new accounts for all their services? That would be a mess.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CascadianGiraffe@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (36 children)

Don't 'break it up', nationalize it, and do the same with all these other giant corporations.

Profits could support UBI instead of encouraging billionaires.

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Why would we support UBISoft? They haven’t released any good games recently

load more comments (35 replies)
[–] Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

God I hope it ends up splitting off Chrome. I think Google has done a great job with Chrome. But the recent Manifest v3 makes it clear they're going to greatly degrade their users' experience for Google's bottom line. And they're using their market dominance to do it.

[–] pingveno@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What does that even look like as a business model, though? There's an expectation now that you don't pay for web browsers. What would a standalone Chrome, Inc. look like?

[–] Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Something very close to Mozilla in my opinion. They'd have the browser as their core product, a few more apps as a logical extension of that (maybe a mail client like Thubderbird), perhaps Chrome Inc would inherit google's office suite? That would be a breath of fresh air. Maybe revive a few of Google's killed ventures that seemed more than promising.

[–] nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz 0 points 3 months ago

Mozilla basically gets all its money from Google

Chrome on its own does not make Google money, in fact the only reason they care about chrome is because it helps Google search engine. I can't find the article, but there was an email from a google exec saying something along those lines

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Mozilla is about to have serous issues because almost 90% of their funding was from Google's illegal payments to make them the default search engine.

So maybe not the best model after all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago
[–] Neon@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I so want this to happen, but at the same time I'm scared that Samsung or whoever will buy AOSP and enshittify it completely

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] littlewonder@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Will this work out for consumers if other tech giants like Apple, Microsoft, or Amazon, etc. aren't also broken up simultaneously? Won't Google's assets just get sucked up into another existing monopoly and we'll be right back where we were but with one less choice than before?

I'm genuinely curious.

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Capitalism finds a way.

[–] auzy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It won't. It simply benefits Apple and Amazon who should have been broken up a decade ago

Amazon literally has had a mostly worldwide monopoly

Don't forget that the right wing has a hard-on for Google. People like them are Apple's target market (I guarantee their families were the first to get iPads) and don't forget their really warped questions during the congressional hearings which demonstrated that they had done absolutely no research and had a huge inherent bias. Stupid questions like "if I walk 3m to the right, can you guys see that". Or, why does president Trump come up as the first hit on Google for loser

I support this, but only if it happens to all 3 companies simultaneously . Otherwise, we're just transferring more power to Apple (who honestly have followed some Trump style tactics over the last 25 years)

I get the idea behind a duopoly, but from an economics and game theory point of view, but, if applied unequally, another monopoly will simply take advantage.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›