this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
43 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

11148 readers
2260 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 months ago (7 children)

The TSA is something that shouldn't exist in its current form. They very often fail their audit checks and normalize invading your privacy to an extreme degree like body scanners and pat downs. If water bottles are considered potentially explosive then why dump them on a bin next to a line of people where they can go off? This is low grade security theater that inconveniences passengers at best.

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's security theater through and through.

Apart from the obvious failings of these checks, think about what kind of damage a single backpack of explosives can do to a packed airport during holiday season. You can literally put a ton of explosives on one of those trolleys, roll it into the waiting area and kill 200 people easily. No security whatsoever involved.

Reality is, most security measures are designed to keep the illusion of control. Nothing more. Penetration testers show again and again that you can easily circumvent practically all barriers or measures.

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago (4 children)

The goal is not to stop the people in the queue being attacked, its to stop someone boarding a plane with the means to hijack it

[–] nednobbins@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They fail gloriously at at that too.

Whenever they get tested the red teams manage to smuggle in everything needed to hijiack a plane plus a kitchen sink.

The few times that terrorists tried to board planes, they made it through security and were caught by other passengers.

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

That's what's changed. Before, a hijacking meant a free trip to south America or Cuba. Now it means you're likely to die if you don't stop the hijackers. A planeful of pissed off passengers determined to live are gonna stop a would-be hijacker.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They had to do something about the plague of people hijacking planes with bottles of water.

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago

IIRC water happens to appear similarly to a lot of explosives on the metric they use for what the composition of items in the scanner is.

Improvements are being made though so soon we may be allowed to take water through unrestricted:

Why Airport Security Suddenly Got Better (13:01) https://youtu.be/nyG8XAmtYeQ?si=RTjA8GRuZaMIJs9d

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

I’ll drown him! I swear to god I’ll drown him!

[–] Liz@midwest.social 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, and you don't need the TSA for that. Just do as they already do: lock the cockpit.

[–] w2tpmf@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Little known fact: many of the pilots behind those locked doors are armed as well.

The Flight Deck Officer program allows pilots to volunteer to become deputized Air Marshals. They receive training and are issued a badge and a gun.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Good guy with a gun, we're not mentally ill at all !

[–] w2tpmf@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Police officers are mentally ill? Interesting take.

Also, we're talking about pilots that you are already trusting with you're life and the lives of hundreds of people with you. If they were mentally ill they could just crash the plane and kill you.

These guys are genuinely invested in maintaining the safety of human lives.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago

They should continue focusing on that instead of gun politics and their farcical contrived scenarios to have guns on a civil plane.

[–] w2tpmf@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So police officers are mentally ill? Interesting take.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well, conceivably those in the cockpit could be manipulated through other threats. Either threats to crash the plane, or threats to hurt the people in the back.

[–] w2tpmf@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Part of their training includes risk assessment that teaches them to sacrifice individuals if it is in favor of maintaining control of the plane.

They flat out train them to shoot through a hostage someone is holding. That one person's life isn't worth sacrificing the lives of hundreds of others on board as well is casualties on the ground.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Ah yes, it's okay if we die, just don't take the corporate infrastructure with you when you go...

[–] psivchaz@reddthat.com 3 points 3 months ago

It's basically the only type of jobs program that both sides of our broken government can agree on: petty nonsense that looks like it might do something useful, but really doesn't, and only inconveniences the poors.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The main reason that rule still exists is to sell overpriced water. Otherwise they could just ask you to drink some of it to prove it's water.

[–] cactusupyourbutt@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

you are allowed to take empty bottles with you, just saying

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 months ago

Some airports have no place to refill and have only hot water in the toilet sinks. It's inhumane.

[–] fermionsnotbosons@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

According to the story I heard as to the origin of the "no liquids over X amount" rule, years ago there was a terrorist that tried to smuggle hydrogen peroxide and acetone - which can be used to rather easily synthesize triacetone triperoxide (TATP, a highly sensitive explosive) - onto a plane in plastic toiletry bottles. They got caught and foiled somehow, and then the TSA started restricting liquids on planes. This was in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, if I recall correctly.

And I happen to know, from a reliable source, of someone who accidentally made TATP in a rotary evaporator in an academic lab. So it seems plausible.

Not that the rule is actually effective prevention against similar attacks, nor that the TSA even knows what the reason is behind what they do at this point, haha. I just thought it was an interesting story.

[–] m4xie@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

hydrogen peroxide and acetone

So there are worse cleaning chemicals to mix than bleach and vinegar

[–] Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They treat people like cattle because they are protecting the airplanes and the airline's liability, not the people onboard or in line to board.

If people think it's unsafe people won't pay up to fly.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The main reason why it exists is to provide jobs. The number of people who work at the TSA at every airport in every state...no representative wants to cut those jobs.

[–] AltheaHunter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago (5 children)

I fucking hate that this is a thing. "We can't stop doing this useless and/or detrimental thing, look at all the work it makes for other people to do!!!" Absolutely bonkers that it's just a standard political argument.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

It's because all the shops inside want you to buy their shit.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Big caveat

The final decision rests with the TSA officer on whether an item is allowed through the checkpoint.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 1 points 3 months ago

Ah yes, the "rules only apply when I say they do" rule. Much legitimate.

[–] Mercuri@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's actually stated on the TSA website that frozen liquids are permitted. https://www.tsa.gov/travel/security-screening/whatcanibring/items/ice

[–] stalfoss@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

Notice the footnote on every TSA webpage that their officers can always change the rules on the spot if they feel like it. So it’s always a gamble.

[–] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 months ago

The longer they discuss the less it is allowed.

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Dear TSA,

The human body is mostly water. And it's way more than 3 oz.

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I brought frozen fish with ice packs through TSA. The TSA guy was a fisherman and wanted to talk about fishing.

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 1 points 3 months ago

Do you think they get mad if I bring plasma

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago
[–] ma11ie@lemmy.one 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] jlow@beehaw.org 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Is there a reasoning for this? The whole liquid thing has to do something with explosives?

[–] ma11ie@lemmy.one 1 points 3 months ago

It’s because of a particular incident. Similar to what happened with the shoe bomber and why you have to take off your shoes. Things like this are why we can’t have nice things. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_transatlantic_aircraft_plot

load more comments
view more: next ›