I always argue that human learning does exactly the same. You just parrot and after some time you believe it's your knowledge. Inventing new things is applying seen before mechanisms on different dataset.

[–] DrJenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They're kind of right. LLMs are not general intelligence and there's not much evidence to suggest that LLMs will lead to general intelligence. A lot of the hype around AI is manufactured by VCs and companies that stand to make a lot of money off of the AI branding/hype.

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah this sounds about right. What was OP implying I’m a bit lost?

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago

I believe they were implying that a lot of the people who say "it's not real AI it's just an LLM" are simply parroting what they've heard.

Which is a fair point, because AI has never meant "general AI", it's an umbrella term for a wide variety of intelligence like tasks as performed by computers.
Autocorrect on your phone is a type of AI, because it compares what words you type against a database of known words, compares what you typed to those words via a "typo distance", and adds new words to it's database when you overrule it so it doesn't make the same mistake.

It's like saying a motorcycle isn't a real vehicle because a real vehicle has two wings, a roof, and flies through the air filled with hundreds of people.