this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59587 readers
2940 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago (3 children)

We can't even come together to wear a peice of cloth to slow the spread of a virus.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Actually we DID. Tho' only for a little while. And the results were enormous. The B/Yamgata Influenza lineage appears to have gone extinct. The cool part is we weren't even trying to do anything with those specific efforts to affect influenza. All of which should encourage us to cooperate more. No less.

[–] Potatisen@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Please give us more cool facts!

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

Doctor Ignaz Semmelweiss in the mid-1800s suggested that obstetricians should wash and sterilize their hands before attending their patients to reduce the chance of postpartum infection. He was rejected by the medical community, ridiculed by colleagues, and eventually locked in an asylum where he was killed.

We're sliding back in time.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

People forget the most important bit. The clapback to Semmelweiss from other doctors was "A doctor's hands are always clean!"

Humans are irrational fucking idiots and we prove it daily. The number of us who are willing to protect our own in-group over things they don't deserve to be protected over is too damn high.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

"A doctor's hands are always clean!"

That's when Semmelweiss should have rubbed dog shit on his hands and tried to rub them on these doctors' face.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

But it's very interesting to think where we would be technologically and socially if humans weren't such assholes

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pop@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago

Why the change of heart at tha last sentence?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (8 children)

The cloth does nothing to stop the virus but also completely cuts off oxygen to your brain.

No I will not explain. It's your job to educate yourself by watching more Jordan Peterson videos.

[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] naught@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago

Just stopping by to say that I understood the obvious sarcasm/joke

[–] TheKracken@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I hope you're a troll. That's just next level stupidity to be real.

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 0 points 5 months ago

The second sentence tells me troll/sarcasm. But there are people who unironically believe that

[–] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Goddamnit, stop making me click the downvote button twice!

[–] illi@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago

I know it's stupid but /s really should be mandatory if you arennot serious. Because there are too many prople that are

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 0 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


In an exercise involving multiple US government agencies during April 2024, NASA conducted a so-called "tabletop" game in which participants plot their response to a 72 percent chance that an asteroid may hit Earth in 14 years.

Underpinning a bewildering number of moving parts is the likelihood that space agencies are not ready to implement the operations needed to find out more about the threat and mitigate it, even with more than a decade to prepare.

The game also found that the "role of the UN-endorsed Space Mission Planning and Advisory Group (SMPAG) in an asteroid impact threat scenario is not fully understood by all participants."

"Sustaining the space mission, disaster preparedness, and communications efforts across a 14-year timeline would be challenging due to budget cycles, changes in political leadership, personnel, and ever-changing world events," the report says.

It recommends "periodic briefings and exercises to continue to raise awareness of planetary defense and increase readiness for preparation and response to an asteroid impact threat."

Speaking to US public radio service NPR, Terik Daly, planetary defense section supervisor at the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, said experts didn't know of any asteroids of a substantial size that are going to hit Earth for the next hundred years.


The original article contains 610 words, the summary contains 206 words. Saved 66%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] PenisWenisGenius@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Congress is making laws about bathrooms and genitals like a bunch of 3rd graders running a minecraft server. Of course we can't handle fucking asteroid defense.

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Maybe the 10 commandments posted in every Louisiana classroom will stop the asteroids.

[–] teejay@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

It reminds me of how tech companies are all scrambling to use AI. There was a funny article recently where the author pointed out that these companies are struggling to do very basic things, so the idea that they could somehow tackle AI in a way that's useful and profitable is silly.

Here's the article, very entertaining and worth the read.

[–] peanuts4life@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Call me an optimist, but I think that if an android was actually going to destroy life as we know it, nations would do everything in their power to advert the disaster.

[–] polonius-rex@kbin.run 0 points 5 months ago (6 children)

you really think ONE android could wipe out life as we know it?

[–] peanuts4life@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 5 months ago

🤣 just visualizing the United Nations Assembly talking turns curb stomping some poor android.

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yeah, I mean it'd at least need to be two androids, right? I've seen terminator.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Now, if we were talking about one Nokia...

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

"According to The Atlantic, an asteroid that weighs more than 1.7 quadrillion metric tons could sterilize Earth by raising the temperature of its water above 100°C. This asteroid would be 10–1,000 times heavier than the asteroid that killed the dinosaurs and would be between 60–96 kilometers (37–60 miles) wide."

The Atlantic article itself is paywalled, but yes, and it's entirely dependent on the mass of said Asteroid.

[–] polonius-rex@kbin.run 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

i'm not worried because an android that heavy couldn't even stand up

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago

I’m not sure I learned anything new other than I want to play the tabletop game they created.

[–] EvilEyedPanda@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

We'd rather bomb each other than save the planet.

[–] OsaErisXero@kbin.run 0 points 5 months ago

If ace combat has taught me anything, it's that there's no reason we can't do both

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 0 points 5 months ago

Also there's this survey that shows we actually would prefer stopping climate change instead of war.
https://kbin.run/m/climate@slrpnk.net/t/505138/Most-people-in-petrostates-want-quick-switch-to-clean-energy

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I'm roundaboutly reminded of one of my favorite novels - Greener Than You Think, by Ward Moore.

It's a science fiction story about the end of the world that was written in the late 40s. The proximate cause of the end is all of the landmasses of Earth being smothered by a gigantic and very aggressive strain of Bermuda grass, but the real cause is the utter and complete failure, due to ignorance, greed, selfishness, short-sightedness, incompetence, arrogance and so on, of every attempt to combat it.

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (6 children)

Whenever I dare to hope about the lofty, admirable star trek future, I remember that space is completely unforgiving and we just aren't up to the task for anything more than a token selfie by the best dozen humans we can possibly produce with great effort and training.

As a species, we aren't going to spread out there. Still too primitive, and probably too self-destructive to make it out of this phase of evolution.

We aren't even capable of caring for one another, let alone the EASIEST to maintain, most naturally human friendly habitat we would ever encounter in the cosmos as we evolved to fit it. No airlocks, the air/water/waste recycling was already fully automated, all we had to do was not recklessly grow/metastasize to the point we strain the absolutely massive system out of greed and glut, and stop carelessly shitting where we sleep. We all know how that's been going since we figured out how to make dead animal poison rocket us accross town.

Master space? Master planetary defense? We'll be lucky if we aren't scattered tribes living near the old hardened structures of the before times for emergency shelter from the new normal weather events in a hundred years. We're already starting to argue over the resources it's taking to rebuild population centers from the current new normal.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

We aren’t even capable of caring for one another

It's the part that drives me the most wild. We're all stuck on this shitty rock hurtling through space together, literally the bare minimum we could do to make it bearable is to be kind to one another and supportive of one another. We can't even be fucked with bare minimum.

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Same, if we can't even, in actions not rhetoric, start from a baseline of "we're all in the same boat, we all have needs and seek happiness, how do we maximize everyone's well-being to facilitate that?" then we're still just savage animals wrestling in the dirt, but with the dangerous capacity to devise technologies for selfish ends we aren't wise/evolved enough to truly appreciate the consequences of using.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Tbf, in order for humanity to get where they're at in the Star Trek timeline they had to go through WWIII: Nuclear edition

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Covid kind of disillusioned me to the whole "all humanity needs is a common enemy/suffering to get right" concept.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Iirc, it wasn't just that as far as Star Trek goes. Iirc, most world governments and economic systems were destroyed, humanity was a mere fraction of its peak population. Humanity literally physically came together because it was necessary to rebuild.

Its one thing to have a common enemy/suffering without changing anything else as far as governments and social systems goes. It's completely different when you not only have the enemy/suffering but to also need to literally rebuild everything from scratch

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The most horrifying possible outcome of a World War is, arguably, there being a definitive "winner".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Humanity literally physically came together because it was necessary to rebuild.

I'm pretty sure that didn't really happen until after the Vulcans showed up, TBH.

From Memory Alpha:

During the 2060s, Cochrane and his team of engineers began developing the warp drive. (Star Trek: First Contact) The challenge of inventing warp theory took Cochrane an extremely long time. (ENT: "Anomaly (ENT)") In 2061, he was responsible for Earth's first successful demonstration of light speed propulsion, though his work was far from complete. (VOY: "Friendship One"; ENT: "In a Mirror, Darkly, Part II" library computer file) His primary motivation for commencing warp technology was financial gain in the devastated, poverty-stricken America that existed in the wake of the Third World War.

He finally built Earth's first warp ship, the Phoenix, in the hope its success would prove profitable and allow him to retire to a tropical island filled with naked women. A historical irony was that, contrary to the fact he went on to use the Phoenix to inaugurate an era of peace, Cochrane incorporated a weapon of mass destruction into its design; he constructed the Phoenix in a silo on a missile complex and used a Titan II missile as his launch vehicle.

(WWIII ended in 2053; First Contact was on 5 April 2063)

[–] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

The Bell Riots (and Irish reunification) are due in a few months.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

I remember that space is completely unforgiving and we just aren’t up to the task for anything more than a token selfie

"Wow, rude!" -- Carl Sagan, probably

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sloppy_diffuser@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago

Don't Look Up!

[–] Leg@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Real talk, an asteroid wiping us out would only expedite the inevitable. If we could pull together and deflect an asteroid, there's hope. If not, we failed the test and die with the consequences. But we don't need the asteroid to fail this test. We're making great strides towards destroying our home with home field advantage.

[–] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Gotta give it to humanity, though. We're damn good at ruining everything we touch.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Half the population would believe the asteroid is a hoax spread by the [insert ethnic or religious group here].

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

We are not at a point where the "global community" is more than a few competing, egoistic and greedy tribes with clashing world views, so that's no surprise.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›