this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
536 points (96.9% liked)

Mildly Interesting

17442 readers
46 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 136 points 5 months ago (2 children)

My bet is on beeswax for the non-vegan ingredient.

[–] SanderTuit@lemmy.world 48 points 5 months ago

You would be right. I have the same packs. I don't know if I bought old stock, but I bought the pack with the blue lid recently, the black lid pack is older.

The black lid pack contains bee wax and more water than the blue lid pack (64% vs 57% of the natural ingredients).

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Probably this and a synthetic emulsifier/surfactant or the like.

[–] ricdeh@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)

That would be vegan though

[–] restingboredface@sh.itjust.works 22 points 5 months ago (3 children)

It depends. Many vegans see any product that "exploits" animals as nonvegan. That includes things like down feathers, wool and honey.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JASN_DE@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Not a natural ingredient though.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 5 months ago

And beeswax is an animal product.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ShaunaTheDead@fedia.io 99 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (13 children)

"Matt" paste? Isn't it "matte" or am I taking crazy pills again?

Edit: What the fuck... It's spelled differently in the UK, the US, and Canada (where I'm from). It's matte in Canada, mat in US, and matt in the UK.

From the Government of Canada website: https://www.noslangues-ourlanguages.gc.ca/en/writing-tips-plus/matte-mat-matt

[–] PrimeErective@startrek.website 149 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Pretty sure it's matte in the US, too

[–] MeaanBeaan@lemmy.world 85 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Seconded. Literally have never seen it spelled mat.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 months ago (2 children)

"Mat" is a small rug usually for wiping shoes on. "Matt" is a boy's name, short for Matthew. "Matte" means the opposite of glossy.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 64 points 5 months ago

It's definitely matte in the USA.

[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 45 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Thirding the notion that it's definitely not "mat" in the US. A mat is something you put on the ground, Matt is my cousin's ex-fiance, and matte is a surface finish with little to no shine.

Really don't know what people say English is hard to learn, we use the same word for so many things that there's fewer words to learn /s

[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Why waste time say lots words when few words do trick?

[–] Steve@startrek.website 20 points 5 months ago

USA here- matte

[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 17 points 5 months ago

It’s matte in the US. I think the manufacturer is just being silly

[–] ColonelPanic@lemm.ee 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

From the UK. I've never seen matte spelled as matt. CA, UK and AU are generally pretty close with spelling, whereas the US is usually off doing its own thing. It's a similar thing to blonde and blond.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 20 points 5 months ago (15 children)

Blonde = female; blond = male

[–] spaduf@slrpnk.net 10 points 5 months ago

But that's the french's fault.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Now I'm not saying anything, but I dated a Matt, and he did produce a lot of paste... I'd have to run the numbers to see if it's viable for mass-production though.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 86 points 5 months ago (10 children)
[–] Mango@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

I'm the non vegan ingredient.

[–] TechAnon@lemm.ee 8 points 5 months ago

Matt's just fine, what do you think they made the paste out of? "Is that hair gel?"

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] The2b@lemmy.vg 43 points 5 months ago (6 children)

It's no longer labeled vegan. A lot of producers actively avoid the label, despite the fact that the Vegan Society would provide their stamp of approval. I've heard somewhere putting it on your product lowers sales. All this to say, are you certain it's actually not vegan anymore?

[–] Schmeckinger@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

Someone said the non vegan version has bee wax in it.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Definitely a thing. Vegan can be hidden somewhere on some products, or they might use different language.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 10 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I ran an experiment a few years ago at a party I hosted. I had two trays of Oreos. One labeled 'Oreos', the other labeled 'Vegan Oreos'. Now, Oreos are vegan, but aren't labeled as such. I had to refill the standard Oreos a couple times throughout the night. The 'Vegan' labeled tray ended the night with more than half still there. Vegan definitely plays a role in sales, and not always for the best.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MadLegoChemist@startrek.website 31 points 5 months ago (3 children)

It looks like the 91% natural ingredients version has benzyl alcohol as a preservative which is typically synthetically derived and in my experience can drastically shift the bio-based ratio.

As far as I can see, the rest of the ingredients are the same, but the sourcing of those ingredients could be different which could also shift the naturally derived percentage.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago

Who's Matt and how come you've got his paste?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I wouldn't even be surprised if this is just a shift in marketing. The "Vegan" label, in particular, has fallen out of style as more and more men become obsessed with meat-based diets.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's some kind of hair gel, you don't eat it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 13 points 5 months ago

I think you might have gotten old stock when you bought a 'new' tin. When I look on their website, it only has the vegan formulation listed, and the ingredients do appear to be derived from non-animal sources.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 months ago

Welp, looks like I won't be licking your hair anytime soon you monster.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Damn, I guess you will have to find a new hair product to eat.

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

You are showing them backwards - the NEW formulation is the one that says vegan. Did you buy the second one at Big Lots or something?

[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I was about two make a whole lecture about percentage points but it just so happens it actually is ~6% less in this case.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›