this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
127 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30566 readers
144 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sentinian@lemmy.one 23 points 1 year ago (63 children)

This game gets universal praise and I'd love to play it but as a PC gamer I refuse to as I wouldn't want to support a dev who not only never does sales but raises the price because of "inflation"

[–] wafer@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (21 children)

Why did you put inflation in quotes like it isn't real?

https://www.rateinflation.com/inflation-rate/usa-inflation-rate/

At $35 right now the game is reasonably priced for the amount of value you will get out of it. I believe there is an expansion on the way as well...

[–] ATwig@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

$35 being reasonable is an understatement. Most people take 50h to get through their first "full playthrough" and the replayability is limitless. Then there's free workshop content that'll take abase game and add another 200h onto it (Space Exploration, Krastorio, Sea Block, Bob's, Angels, etc)

Plus: They still have a free demo with no time limit too. You get exposed to the core loop within five minutes of playing and you'll know if it clicks or not for you before you even have to buy.

I bought the game at $25 but I'd buy it again at $35 and not regret anything...

[–] iamhazel@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I have like 400 hours and have never launched a rocket, used logistic bots, or made a train, lmao fml but I adore this game

[–] ATwig@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol. I basically only do rail worlds now or heavy mods (I'm like 75h into a space exploration run and just started going to other planets).

But no logistics bots? You mad man

[–] iamhazel@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have a bad habit of restarting all the time, and I've always loaded up on mods.. I've just never expanded enough to figure out logistic bots which kinda intimidate me.

[–] ATwig@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bots are straightforward:

Storage is storage. This is where the bots put things you deconstruct and where the bots grab things to build.

Requestor chests use bots to attempt to always have the amount(s) you set in them at all times.

Active providers attempt to be empty all the time. Logistics bots will move items out of these chests into storage.

Passive providers are like active providers but don't need to be empty all the time. Bots will take out of a passive provider before storage (even if storage is closer to the destination)

Buffer chests are weird. I don't fully understand them but i believe they're basically normal chests until you get over X amount in them then they turn into active providers? You can set an option on requester chests to request from buffers and then i believe that it then ignores whatever buffer settings you have... I never use them...

An important nuance is that the network will try to keep the same item in the same chest so if you have wood in a storage chest in the north bots will fly PAST empty storage to go to that specific chest that already has wood in it. Also bots will never put items back in a provider and will never take out of a requestor even if the items inside are no longer requested by the chest.

Basically throw down a lot of storage chests in one place. Put passive providers as the output for stuff you build. Put requestor chests as input for assemblers (if you copy an assembler with a recipe you can paste it onto a requestor to automatically request the ingredients). Do not put gears in your network it's just easier to move iron around and make gears where you need it.

[–] iamhazel@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay that actually helped a lot! What about the other bots?

[–] ATwig@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Construction bots just build blueprints and deconstruct things marked for deconstruction. They take items from providers first (active then passive) then storage. They'll put things picked up into storage (not sure if they go into requestors directly though).

You can build a personal robo port and put it inside your suit, then robots you have in your personal inventory will construct/deconstruct in an area around you and put/pull from your inventory only.

Usually you'll want more logistics robots than construction but you can select any robo port and see the number of available/idle bots of each type in the network. If you wanna get real fancy you can get these numbers out with wires and use combinatiors to do some logic like: Only add bots if all bots are in use or other such things

Edit: Construction bots will also repair damaged buildings! Just have repair packs in storage in your network somewhere and they'll make sure every building inside your network is at 100% health!

[–] HrBingR@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Logistic bots are a game changer. For real.

[–] Jako301@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah, logistic bots are just a matter of convenience. While it helps with compact builds, most of the time they simply are a substitute for belts.

Construction bots are where its at.

[–] HrBingR@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Right you are, apologies, construction bots are a game changer. Logistic bots can be convenient though.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (60 replies)